Factors impacting the use or rejection of hearing aids—A systematic review and meta-analysis

[EN]Abstract: Purpose: To examine the prevalence of adherence to hearing aids and determine their rejection causes. Methods: This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting terms for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We performed an electronic search using PubMe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Marcos Alonso, Susana, Almeida Ayerve, Cristina Nicole, Monopoli Roca, Chiara, Coronel Touma, Guillermo Salib, Pacheco López, Sofia, Peña Navarro, Paula, Serradilla López, José Manuel, Sánchez Gómez, Hortensia, Pardal-Refoyo, José Luis, Batuecas Caletrio, Ángel
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)
Repositorio:GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca
OAI Identifier:oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/163537
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10366/163537
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Hearing aid adherence
Hearing aid rejection
Sensorineural hearing loss
Hearing aids
Hearing
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural
Hearing Aids
audífonos
pérdida auditiva neurosensorial
audición
Descripción
Sumario:[EN]Abstract: Purpose: To examine the prevalence of adherence to hearing aids and determine their rejection causes. Methods: This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting terms for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We performed an electronic search using PubMed, BVS, and Embase. Results: 21 studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected. They analyzed a total of 12,696 individuals. We observed that the most common causes for positive adherence to hearing aid use included having a higher degree of hearing loss, patients being aware of their condition, and requiring the device in their daily life. The most common causes for rejection were the lack of perceived benefits or discomfort with the use of the device. The results from the meta-analysis show a prevalence of patients who used their hearing aid of 0.623 (95% CI 0.531, 0.714). Both groups are highly heterogeneous (I2 = 99.31% in each group, p < 0.05). Conclusions: A significant proportion of patients (38%) do not use their hearing aid devices. Homogeneous multicenter studies using the same methodology are needed to analyze the causes of rejection of hearing aids.

Similares en LA Referencia