Cuatro obras de Mauricio Beuchot
The paper examines Beuchot's approach and agrees that there are many coincidences between medieval Aristotelianism and analytical philosophy. Both pursue philosophical inquiry in an argumentative manner. Nowadays analytical philosophy also tends to recognize as genuine such traditional metaphys...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 1989 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| Repositorio: | DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digital.csic.es:10261/9837 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/9837 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Mauricio Beuchot Aristotelismo medieval Filosofía analítica Investigación filosófica Argumentación Metafísica Escolástica Analogía Cláusulas reduplicativas Univocismo Lógicas combinatorias Inefabilidad Medieval aristotelianism Analytical philosophy Philosophical inquiry Argumentation metaphysics Scholastics Analogy Reduplicative clauses Univocism Combinatory logics Ineffableness |
| Resumo: | The paper examines Beuchot's approach and agrees that there are many coincidences between medieval Aristotelianism and analytical philosophy. Both pursue philosophical inquiry in an argumentative manner. Nowadays analytical philosophy also tends to recognize as genuine such traditional metaphysical problems as were debated by the Scholastics. The paper's only criticism at Beuchot's views concerns analogy and reduplicative as-clauses. It argues that on that issue the cleavage between medieval and analytical philosophy lies in the latter's tending to favor complete equivocality of the word «being». However, an alternative is possible, namely univocism, as implemented in combinatory logics, which while also rejecting reduplicative clauses is free from the ineffableness attendant upon equivocism |
|---|