Alveolar bone reconstruction simultaneous to implant removal due to advanced peri-implantitis defects: a proof of concept

Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of alveolar bone reconstruction simultaneous to implant removal due to peri-implantitis. Material and methods: Partial or fully dentulous patients subjected to implant removal due to advanced peri-implantitis (≥ 50% of bone loss) lesions and seekin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Monje, Alberto, Costanza Soldini, Maria, Rosen, Paul S., Tarnow, Dennis, Nart, Jose, Pons, Ramón
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:20.500.12328/4813
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/4813
https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13352
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Complicació implant endossi
Implant dental
Mucositis
Malaltia periimplantària
Periimplantitis
Complicación implante endoóseo
Implante dental
Enfermedad periimplantaria
Complication endosseous implant
Dental implant
Peri-implant disease
Peri-implantitis
616.3
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of alveolar bone reconstruction simultaneous to implant removal due to peri-implantitis. Material and methods: Partial or fully dentulous patients subjected to implant removal due to advanced peri-implantitis (≥ 50% of bone loss) lesions and seeking to have the failed implant replaced for esthetic or functional reasons were consecutively included. Guided bone regeneration was performed by means of a mixture of xenograft and autogenous bone and a ribose cross-linked barrier membrane. Re-entry for implant placement was performed at 4-month follow-up. Overall, six radiographic variables were assessed before (T0) and after (T1) alveolar bone reconstruction at four levels in ridge width (RW) and height (RH). Peri-implant conditions were evaluated at latest follow-up. Simple and multiple binary logistic regression models were calculated using generalized estimation equations to evaluate the effect of baseline upon reconstructive outcomes. Results: In total, 20 patients (nimplant = 39) met the inclusion criteria. Alveolar RW and RH were augmented from T0 to T1 at all levels. All implants achieved primary stability. Only ~13% were subjected to ancillary bone regeneration simultaneous to implant placement. After a mean follow-up period after loading of ~2.2 years, ~70% implants demonstrated peri-implant health, while mucositis was diagnosed in the remaining implants. Conclusion: The performance of alveolar bone reconstruction in residual partially contained defects simultaneous to implant removal due to peri-implantitis lesions demonstrates being safe and effective for implant site development.