Active humidification in mechanical ventilation is not associated to an increase in respiratory infectious complications in a quasi-experimental pre-post intervention study

Objective: There is controversy regarding the influence of humidification systems upon the incidence of respiratory infections associated to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). An evaluation was made of the differences in the incidence of pneumonia and tracheobronchitis associated to mechanical v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Picazo Moreno, Lucía, Gracia Arnillas, María Pilar, Muñoz-Bermúdez, Rosana, Duran Jordà, Xavier, 1974-, Álvarez Lerma, Francisco, Masclans Enviz, Joan Ramon
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:10230/53635
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10230/53635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2019.11.008
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Active humidification
Humidificación activa
Hygroscopic heat and moisture exchange
Infección respiratoria
Intercambiador calor-humedad
Invasive mechanical ventilation
Neumonía asociada a la ventilación (NAV)
Respiratory infection
Traqueobronquitis asociada a la ventilación (TAV)
Ventilación mecánica invasiva
Ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP)
Ventilator associated tracheobronquitis (VAT)
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: There is controversy regarding the influence of humidification systems upon the incidence of respiratory infections associated to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). An evaluation was made of the differences in the incidence of pneumonia and tracheobronchitis associated to mechanical ventilation (VAP and VAT, respectively) with passive and active humidification. Design: A retrospective pre-post quasi-experimental study was carried out. Setting: A polyvalent ICU with 14 beds. Patients: All patients connected to IMV for >48h during 2014 and 2016 were included. Interventions: During 2014, passive humidification with an hygroscopic heat and moisture exchanger (HME) was used, while during 2016 active humidification with a heated humidifier (HH) and an inspiratory heated wire was used. Identical measures for the prevention of VAP were established (Zero Pneumonia Project). Main outcome measures: The incidence of VAP and VAT was estimated for 1000 days of IMV in both groups, and statistically significant differences were assessed using Poisson regression analysis. Results: A total of 287 patients were included (116 with HME and 171 with HH). The incidence density of VAP per 1000 days of IMV was 5.68 in the HME group and 5.80 in the HH group (p=ns). The incidence density of VAT was 3.41 and 3.26 cases per 1000 days of VMI with HME and HH respectively (p=ns). The duration of IMV was identified as a risk factor for VAP. Conclusions: In our population, active humidification in patients ventilated for >48h was not associated to an increase in respiratory infectious complications.