Smell and anosmia in the aesthetic appreciation of gardens

In his 'Critique of the Power of Judgment', Kant defined the garden as a visual art and considered that smell plays no role in its aesthetic appreciation. If the Kantian thesis were right, then a person who has no sense of smell (who suffers from anosmia) would not be impaired in his or he...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Author: Tafalla, Marta|||0000-0002-0199-9552
Format: article
Publication Date:2014
Country:España
Institution:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repository:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Language:English
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:188724
Online Access:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/188724
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Aesthetic appreciation
Anosmia
Beauty
David E. Cooper
Form
Garden
Home
Kant
Meaning
Mara Miller
Smell
Transience
Description
Summary:In his 'Critique of the Power of Judgment', Kant defined the garden as a visual art and considered that smell plays no role in its aesthetic appreciation. If the Kantian thesis were right, then a person who has no sense of smell (who suffers from anosmia) would not be impaired in his or her aesthetic appreciation of gardens. At the same time, a visually impaired person could not appreciate the beauty of gardens, although he or she could perceive them through hearing, smell, taste, and touch. In this paper I discuss the role of smell and anosmia in the aesthetic appreciation of gardens. I accept the Kantian idea that the appreciation of a garden is the appreciation of its form, but I also defend that, at least in some cases, smell can belong to the form of gardens and, consequently, the ability or inability to smell influences their aesthetic appreciation.