La crítica hegeliana a las conversiones entre modos operadas por Leibniz
The Leibniz’s criticism to nominalism provides the metaphysic a more powerful (modal) logic rather than the extensional one of late-medieval period. At the same time he finds a prosecutive way of thinking that allows the systematization of the intelligibility. I maintain that on the formulation of L...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2005 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Navarra |
| Repositorio: | Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/4749 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/4749 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Leibniz, Gottfried Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich posibilidad nominalismo Lógica |
| Sumario: | The Leibniz’s criticism to nominalism provides the metaphysic a more powerful (modal) logic rather than the extensional one of late-medieval period. At the same time he finds a prosecutive way of thinking that allows the systematization of the intelligibility. I maintain that on the formulation of Leibniz’s ontological argument, one can find the cognoscitive subject. Nevertheless, and in a similar way as Hegel, like Leibniz did not elaborate logic of productive action of inteligible possibility, the facticity introduces itself in the subjects of the monada and on the Self. |
|---|