Effects of monopolar pulsed-capacitive dielectric radiofrequency diathermy in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised clinical trial

Monopolar capacitive diathermy is a physiotherapy technique that uses high-frequency currents to generate heat in deep tissues. This heat can have several therapeutic efects, especially in the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP), however, until now there is little evidence of this type of diat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Lara-Palomo, Inmaculada Carmen, Capel-Alcaraz, Ana Maria, Garcia-Lopez, Hector, Castro-Sanchez, Adelaida Maria, Albornoz Cabello, Manuel
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Sevilla (US)
Repositorio:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
OAI Identifier:oai:idus.us.es:11441/160977
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/11441/160977
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64832-9
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Chronic low back pain
Diathermy
Electrophysical agent
Radiofrequency
Simulated therapy
Descripción
Sumario:Monopolar capacitive diathermy is a physiotherapy technique that uses high-frequency currents to generate heat in deep tissues. This heat can have several therapeutic efects, especially in the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP), however, until now there is little evidence of this type of diathermy. The purpose was to evaluate the efcacy of a pulsed monopolar dielectric radiofrequency diathermy (PRF)-capacitive type versus simulated treatment on symptomatology of patients with CLBP. A single-blind randomised controlled trial was conducted. Sixty patients with CLBP were randomly assigned to a PRF-capacitive or a simulated treatment group. All participants received 3 sessions per week for 3 weeks. Disability, pain intensity, movement phobia, lumbar antefexion, quality of life, and sleep quality were assessed at baseline, after treatment, and at two months. The application of 9 sessions of PRF-capacitive showed signifcant improvements compared to simulated therapy during the entire follow-up for disability (F= 26.99, p < 0.001), pain intensity (F = 0.550, p < 0.001), the quality of life components of physical function (F = 0.780, p < 0.001), social function (F = 0.780, p < 0.001) and mental health (F = 0.858, p = 0.003) and for sleep duration (F = 0.863, p = 0.004).