Corporate entrepreneurship strategy: measuring and mapping an impact model
Research studies on corporate entrepreneurship have been increasing in recent years. This is a consequence of the interest in entrepreneurship, the need for strategic renewal, and the promotion of innovation in firms. The corporate entrepreneurship strategy is part of corporate entrepreneurship, and...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Sevilla (US) |
| Repositorio: | idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:idus.us.es:11441/174512 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/11441/174512 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-025-00516-6 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Corporate entrepreneurship strategy Corporate entrepreneurship Systematic literature review Bibliographic analysis Bibliometrix |
| Sumario: | Research studies on corporate entrepreneurship have been increasing in recent years. This is a consequence of the interest in entrepreneurship, the need for strategic renewal, and the promotion of innovation in firms. The corporate entrepreneurship strategy is part of corporate entrepreneurship, and one of the most frequently used models in scientific research is one proposed by Ireland, Covin, & Kuratko. This research paper conducts a systematic review of the literature to analyze the use and application of this model. The scientific databases consulted were Web of Science and Scopus, with an initial result of 1133 articles. Once the results were unified, 456 were finally selected for analysis. The bibliometrix tool was used to process the information and provide annual production results, and analyze journals, authors, documents, keywords, etc. These results will allow us to identify the prominent authors and research topics in this area, examine the main conceptual, intellectual, and social structures, and detect future research opportunities. The results show that despite the large number of citations, the number of research papers showing the model’s feasibility is still insufficient. |
|---|