Cost-effectiveness of a programme to address sedentary behaviour in older adults

Background: This study details the within-trial economic evaluation and long-term economic model of SITLESS, a multi-country, three-armed randomized controlled trial comparing a combined intervention of exercise referral schemes (ERS) enhanced by self-management strategies (SMS) against ERS alone an...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Deidda, Manuela|||0000-0002-0921-6970, Coll-Planas, Laura|||0000-0001-5204-8717, Tully, Marl A., Giné-Garriga, Maria|||0000-0003-4449-3524, Kee, Frank|||0000-0002-0606-8167, Roqué i Figuls, Marta|||0000-0003-0043-1364, Blackburn, Nicole E.|||0000-0003-4379-6312, Guerra-Balic, Míriam, Rothenbacher, Dietrich|||0000-0002-3563-2791, Dallmeier, Dhayana|||0000-0003-3665-7023, Caserotti, Paolo|||0000-0002-0476-5786, Skjødt, Mathias|||0000-0002-3713-784X, McIntosh, Emma
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2022
País:España
Recursos:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:277701
Acesso em linha:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/277701
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckac017
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Aged
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Exercise
Humans
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Sedentary Behavior
State Medicine
Descrição
Resumo:Background: This study details the within-trial economic evaluation and long-term economic model of SITLESS, a multi-country, three-armed randomized controlled trial comparing a combined intervention of exercise referral schemes (ERS) enhanced by self-management strategies (SMS) against ERS alone and usual care (UC). Methods: A cost-utility analysis, conducted from the base-case perspective of the National Health Service and personal and social services, estimated the incremental cost per incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and years in full capability (YFC). A secondary analysis combined the costs with a broad set of outcomes within a cost-consequence framework, from a societal perspective. A Markov-type decision-analytic model was developed to project short-term changes in physical activity to long-term outcomes and costs, over a 5- and 15-year time horizon. Results: The results of the within-trial analysis show that SMS+ERS is highly likely to be cost-effective compared to ERS alone (ICER €4270/QALY), but not compared to UC. Participants allocated to the SMS+ERS group also showed an improvement in YFC compared to ERS alone and UC. The long-term analysis revealed that SMS+ERS is likely to be a cost-effective option compared to ERS and UC over a 5-year, but not with a 15-year horizon, being then dominated by ERS alone. Conclusion: This research provides new evidence that SMS is a cost-effective add-on to ERS strategies. This economic evaluation informs the case for further, cost-effective, refinement of lifestyle change programmes targeted to older adults, with the aim of ultimately reducing the impact of non-communicable diseases in this population.