¿Basta la prueba de Turing para definir la “inteligencia artificial”?
Since 1950, when Alan Turing proposed his famous test to define artificial intelligence, no computer program has come near to fulfill it. Now that this goal seems a little closer and Turing test looks insufficient, it is convenient to remember John Searle’s argumentation against Turing test.
| Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Publication Date: | 2014 |
| Country: | España |
| Institution: | Universidad de Navarra |
| Repository: | Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra |
| Language: | Spanish |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/37284 |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/37284 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | Materias Investigacion::Teología y Ciencias religiosas Searle’s Chinese Room Turing Test Artificial Intelligence Habitación china de Searle Prueba de Turing Inteligencia artificial |
| Summary: | Since 1950, when Alan Turing proposed his famous test to define artificial intelligence, no computer program has come near to fulfill it. Now that this goal seems a little closer and Turing test looks insufficient, it is convenient to remember John Searle’s argumentation against Turing test. |
|---|