A comparison of three established age estimation methods on an adult Spanish sample.

Most current methods for adult skeletal age-at-death estimation are based on American samples comprising individuals of European and African ancestry. Our limited understanding of population variability hampers our efforts to apply these techniques to various skeletal populations around the world, e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Rissech, Carme, Wilson, Jeremy, Winburn, A., Turbón, Daniel, Steadman, D.
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Fecha de publicación:2012
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:2445/46005
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/2445/46005
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Antropologia forense
Antropometria
Metodologia
Espanya
Forensic anthropology
Anthropometry
Methodology
Spain
id ES_19f37489bca9c19d31b2b25df0957361
oai_identifier_str oai:recercat.cat:2445/46005
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling A comparison of three established age estimation methods on an adult Spanish sample.Rissech, CarmeWilson, JeremyWinburn, A.Turbón, DanielSteadman, D.Antropologia forenseAntropometriaMetodologiaEspanyaForensic anthropologyAnthropometryMethodologySpainMost current methods for adult skeletal age-at-death estimation are based on American samples comprising individuals of European and African ancestry. Our limited understanding of population variability hampers our efforts to apply these techniques to various skeletal populations around the world, especially in global forensic contexts. Further, documented skeletal samples are rare, limiting our ability to test our techniques. The objective of this paper is to test three pelvic macroscopic methods (1-Suchey-Brooks; 2- Lovejoy; 3- Buckberry and Chamberlain) on a documented modern Spanish sample. These methods were selected because they are popular among Spanish anthropologists and because they never have been tested in a Spanish sample. The study sample consists of 80 individuals (55 ♂ and 25 ♀) of known sex and age from the Valladolid collection. Results indicate that in all three methods, levels of bias and inaccuracy increase with age. The Lovejoy method performs poorly (27%) compared with Suchey-Brooks (71%) and Buckberry and Chamberlain (86%). However, the levels of correlation between phases and chronological ages are low and comparable in the three methods (< 0.395). The apparent accuracy of the Suchey-Brooks and Buckberry and Chamberlain methods is largely based on the broad width of the methods" estimated intervals. This study suggests that before systematic application of these three methodologies in Spanish populations, further statistical modeling and research into the co-variance of chronological age with morphological change is necessary. Future methods should be developed specific to various world populations, and should allow for both precision and flexibility in age estimation.Springer Verlag2013201320122013info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion32 p.application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/46005Articles publicats en revistes (Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals)reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésVersió postprint del document publicat a: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-011-0586-1International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2012, vol. 126, num. 1, p. 145-155http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-011-0586-1(c) Springer Verlag, 2012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:2445/460052026-05-29T05:05:01Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparison of three established age estimation methods on an adult Spanish sample.
title A comparison of three established age estimation methods on an adult Spanish sample.
spellingShingle A comparison of three established age estimation methods on an adult Spanish sample.
Rissech, Carme
Antropologia forense
Antropometria
Metodologia
Espanya
Forensic anthropology
Anthropometry
Methodology
Spain
title_short A comparison of three established age estimation methods on an adult Spanish sample.
title_full A comparison of three established age estimation methods on an adult Spanish sample.
title_fullStr A comparison of three established age estimation methods on an adult Spanish sample.
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of three established age estimation methods on an adult Spanish sample.
title_sort A comparison of three established age estimation methods on an adult Spanish sample.
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rissech, Carme
Wilson, Jeremy
Winburn, A.
Turbón, Daniel
Steadman, D.
author Rissech, Carme
author_facet Rissech, Carme
Wilson, Jeremy
Winburn, A.
Turbón, Daniel
Steadman, D.
author_role author
author2 Wilson, Jeremy
Winburn, A.
Turbón, Daniel
Steadman, D.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Antropologia forense
Antropometria
Metodologia
Espanya
Forensic anthropology
Anthropometry
Methodology
Spain
topic Antropologia forense
Antropometria
Metodologia
Espanya
Forensic anthropology
Anthropometry
Methodology
Spain
description Most current methods for adult skeletal age-at-death estimation are based on American samples comprising individuals of European and African ancestry. Our limited understanding of population variability hampers our efforts to apply these techniques to various skeletal populations around the world, especially in global forensic contexts. Further, documented skeletal samples are rare, limiting our ability to test our techniques. The objective of this paper is to test three pelvic macroscopic methods (1-Suchey-Brooks; 2- Lovejoy; 3- Buckberry and Chamberlain) on a documented modern Spanish sample. These methods were selected because they are popular among Spanish anthropologists and because they never have been tested in a Spanish sample. The study sample consists of 80 individuals (55 ♂ and 25 ♀) of known sex and age from the Valladolid collection. Results indicate that in all three methods, levels of bias and inaccuracy increase with age. The Lovejoy method performs poorly (27%) compared with Suchey-Brooks (71%) and Buckberry and Chamberlain (86%). However, the levels of correlation between phases and chronological ages are low and comparable in the three methods (< 0.395). The apparent accuracy of the Suchey-Brooks and Buckberry and Chamberlain methods is largely based on the broad width of the methods" estimated intervals. This study suggests that before systematic application of these three methodologies in Spanish populations, further statistical modeling and research into the co-variance of chronological age with morphological change is necessary. Future methods should be developed specific to various world populations, and should allow for both precision and flexibility in age estimation.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012
2013
2013
2013
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format article
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/2445/46005
url https://hdl.handle.net/2445/46005
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Versió postprint del document publicat a: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-011-0586-1
International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2012, vol. 126, num. 1, p. 145-155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-011-0586-1
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv (c) Springer Verlag, 2012
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv (c) Springer Verlag, 2012
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 32 p.
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Verlag
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Verlag
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Articles publicats en revistes (Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals)
reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
instname_str Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
reponame_str Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
collection Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869404076660228096
score 15.811543