Validity and Applicability of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) Criteria in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Medical Conditions

(1) Background: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the concurrent and predictive validity and the applicability of the global leadership initiative on malnutrition (GLIM) criteria in patients hospitalized for acute medical conditions. (2) Methods: prospective cohort study with patients ho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Fontané, Laia, Reig, Maria Helena, Garcia-Ribera, Sonika, Herranz, Miriam, Miracle, Mar, Chillaron, Juan Jose|||0000-0002-8096-1703, Estepa, Araceli, Toro, Silvia, Ballesta Purroy, Sílvia|||0000-0001-8057-1804, Navarro, Humberto, Llauradó, Gemma|||0000-0002-3237-6366, Pedro Botet Montoya, Juan|||0000-0001-7366-6821, Benaiges, David|||0000-0001-5411-364X
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:España
Institución:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:283114
Acceso en línea:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/283114
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.3390/nu15184012
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Global leadership initiative on malnutrition
Nutrition assessment
Malnutrition
Hospitalized patients
Length of stay
Applicability
Descripción
Sumario:(1) Background: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the concurrent and predictive validity and the applicability of the global leadership initiative on malnutrition (GLIM) criteria in patients hospitalized for acute medical conditions. (2) Methods: prospective cohort study with patients hospitalized for acute medical conditions. For validation, the methodology proposed by the GLIM group of experts was used. Sensitivity and specificity values greater than 80% with respect to those for the subjective global assessment (SGA) were necessary for concurrent validation. The time necessary to complete each nutritional assessment test was determined. (3) Results: A total of 119 patients were evaluated. The SGA was applied to the entire cohort, but the GLIM criteria could not be applied to 3.4% of the patients. The sensitivity and specificity of the GLIM criteria with respect to those for the SGA to detect malnutrition were 78.0 and 86.2%, respectively. The GLIM predictive validity criterion was fulfilled because patients with malnutrition more frequently had a hospital stay.