Biological therapies for inflammatory pouch disorders: insights and outcomes from the RESERVO study of GETECCU

Background: Inflammatory pouch disorders can be refractory to conventional therapy. Evidence on biological therapy from large cohorts is scarce. Objective: To explore the use and effectiveness of biological therapy for inflammatory pouch disorders. Design: A retrospective and multicentre study. Meth...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Mesonero, F, Zabana, Y, Fernández-Clotet, A, Leo-Carnerero, E, Caballol, B, Núñez, A, García, MJ, Bertoletti, F, Bastida, G, Suris, G, Casis, B, Ferreiro-Iglesias, R, Calafat, M, Jiménez, I, Miranda-Bautista, J, Lamuela, LJ, Fajardo, I, Torrealba, L, Nájera, R, Sáiz-Chumillas, RM, González-Partida, I, Vicuña, M, García-Morales, N, Gutiérrez, A, López-García, A, Benítez, JM, de Célix, CR, Tejido, C, Brunet-Mas, E, Hernandez-Camba, A, Ferrer, CS, Rodríguez-Lago, I, Piqueras, M, Castaño, A, Ramos, L, Sobrino, A, Rodríguez-Grau, MC, Elosua, A, Montoro-Huguet, MA, Baltar, R, Huguet, JM, Hermida, B, Caballero-Mateos, A, Sánchez-Guillén, L, Bouhmidi, A, Pajares, R, Baston-Rey, I, López-Sanromán, A, Albillos, A, Acosta, MBD
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2026
País:España
Recursos:Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)
Repositorio:r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica
OAI Identifier:oai:dnet:r-fisabio___::2c6c9403a7f058bc256489f123fdacaf
Acesso em linha:https://fisabio.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/20577
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:biological therapy
Crohn's disease of the pouch
pouchitis
id ES_18baed2c619a956699aa9c19c1487426
oai_identifier_str oai:dnet:r-fisabio___::2c6c9403a7f058bc256489f123fdacaf
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Biological therapies for inflammatory pouch disorders: insights and outcomes from the RESERVO study of GETECCUMesonero, FZabana, YFernández-Clotet, ALeo-Carnerero, ECaballol, BNúñez, AGarcía, MJBertoletti, FBastida, GSuris, GCasis, BFerreiro-Iglesias, RCalafat, MJiménez, IMiranda-Bautista, JLamuela, LJFajardo, ITorrealba, LNájera, RSáiz-Chumillas, RMGonzález-Partida, IVicuña, MGarcía-Morales, NGutiérrez, ALópez-García, ABenítez, JMde Célix, CRTejido, CBrunet-Mas, EHernandez-Camba, AFerrer, CSRodríguez-Lago, IPiqueras, MCastaño, ARamos, LSobrino, ARodríguez-Grau, MCElosua, AMontoro-Huguet, MABaltar, RHuguet, JMHermida, BCaballero-Mateos, ASánchez-Guillén, LBouhmidi, APajares, RBaston-Rey, ILópez-Sanromán, AAlbillos, AAcosta, MBDbiological therapyCrohn's disease of the pouchpouchitisBackground: Inflammatory pouch disorders can be refractory to conventional therapy. Evidence on biological therapy from large cohorts is scarce. Objective: To explore the use and effectiveness of biological therapy for inflammatory pouch disorders. Design: A retrospective and multicentre study. Methods: We included patients diagnosed with pouchitis, Crohn's Disease of the Pouch (CDP) or cuffitis and treated with biological therapy. Effectiveness was evaluated at 12 months based on normalisation of stool frequency, absence of pain, faecal urgency or fistula discharge (clinical remission), or as any improvement in these symptoms (clinical response). We also compared the effectiveness of a second biologic after anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) failure using descriptive and comparative statistics. Results: In total, 145 patients were included; 62% were men and the median age was 54 (20-71) years. Overall, 212 lines of treatment were evaluated (95 infliximab, 69 adalimumab, 7 golimumab, 35 vedolizumab and 26 ustekinumab). At least a second line of treatment was received by 41% of patients. Overall, 66% had chronic pouchitis and 29% had CDP. Clinical remission rates at 12 months were 45%, 44%, 43%, 39% and 45% for infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab and ustekinumab, respectively. No differences were found based on the type of disease. Vedolizumab was the only treatment to show better results as a first-line therapy (50% vs 33%, p < 0.05). Thirty-nine patients received a second therapy after anti-TNF failure. Second anti-TNF use had higher risks of failure (odds ratio (OR) 4.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3-19) and discontinuation (OR 5.52, 95% CI 1.94-25.5). Conclusion: Biological therapy is a cornerstone in the treatment of pouch disorders, demonstrating consistently high effectiveness. After anti-TNF failure, another mechanism of action should be employed.SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD2026info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://fisabio.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/20577Therapeutic Advances in GastroenterologyISSN: 1756283XISSNe: 17562848reponame:r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científicainstname:Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)Inglésinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:dnet:r-fisabio___::2c6c9403a7f058bc256489f123fdacaf2026-06-11T12:45:17Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Biological therapies for inflammatory pouch disorders: insights and outcomes from the RESERVO study of GETECCU
title Biological therapies for inflammatory pouch disorders: insights and outcomes from the RESERVO study of GETECCU
spellingShingle Biological therapies for inflammatory pouch disorders: insights and outcomes from the RESERVO study of GETECCU
Mesonero, F
biological therapy
Crohn's disease of the pouch
pouchitis
title_short Biological therapies for inflammatory pouch disorders: insights and outcomes from the RESERVO study of GETECCU
title_full Biological therapies for inflammatory pouch disorders: insights and outcomes from the RESERVO study of GETECCU
title_fullStr Biological therapies for inflammatory pouch disorders: insights and outcomes from the RESERVO study of GETECCU
title_full_unstemmed Biological therapies for inflammatory pouch disorders: insights and outcomes from the RESERVO study of GETECCU
title_sort Biological therapies for inflammatory pouch disorders: insights and outcomes from the RESERVO study of GETECCU
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Mesonero, F
Zabana, Y
Fernández-Clotet, A
Leo-Carnerero, E
Caballol, B
Núñez, A
García, MJ
Bertoletti, F
Bastida, G
Suris, G
Casis, B
Ferreiro-Iglesias, R
Calafat, M
Jiménez, I
Miranda-Bautista, J
Lamuela, LJ
Fajardo, I
Torrealba, L
Nájera, R
Sáiz-Chumillas, RM
González-Partida, I
Vicuña, M
García-Morales, N
Gutiérrez, A
López-García, A
Benítez, JM
de Célix, CR
Tejido, C
Brunet-Mas, E
Hernandez-Camba, A
Ferrer, CS
Rodríguez-Lago, I
Piqueras, M
Castaño, A
Ramos, L
Sobrino, A
Rodríguez-Grau, MC
Elosua, A
Montoro-Huguet, MA
Baltar, R
Huguet, JM
Hermida, B
Caballero-Mateos, A
Sánchez-Guillén, L
Bouhmidi, A
Pajares, R
Baston-Rey, I
López-Sanromán, A
Albillos, A
Acosta, MBD
author Mesonero, F
author_facet Mesonero, F
Zabana, Y
Fernández-Clotet, A
Leo-Carnerero, E
Caballol, B
Núñez, A
García, MJ
Bertoletti, F
Bastida, G
Suris, G
Casis, B
Ferreiro-Iglesias, R
Calafat, M
Jiménez, I
Miranda-Bautista, J
Lamuela, LJ
Fajardo, I
Torrealba, L
Nájera, R
Sáiz-Chumillas, RM
González-Partida, I
Vicuña, M
García-Morales, N
Gutiérrez, A
López-García, A
Benítez, JM
de Célix, CR
Tejido, C
Brunet-Mas, E
Hernandez-Camba, A
Ferrer, CS
Rodríguez-Lago, I
Piqueras, M
Castaño, A
Ramos, L
Sobrino, A
Rodríguez-Grau, MC
Elosua, A
Montoro-Huguet, MA
Baltar, R
Huguet, JM
Hermida, B
Caballero-Mateos, A
Sánchez-Guillén, L
Bouhmidi, A
Pajares, R
Baston-Rey, I
López-Sanromán, A
Albillos, A
Acosta, MBD
author_role author
author2 Zabana, Y
Fernández-Clotet, A
Leo-Carnerero, E
Caballol, B
Núñez, A
García, MJ
Bertoletti, F
Bastida, G
Suris, G
Casis, B
Ferreiro-Iglesias, R
Calafat, M
Jiménez, I
Miranda-Bautista, J
Lamuela, LJ
Fajardo, I
Torrealba, L
Nájera, R
Sáiz-Chumillas, RM
González-Partida, I
Vicuña, M
García-Morales, N
Gutiérrez, A
López-García, A
Benítez, JM
de Célix, CR
Tejido, C
Brunet-Mas, E
Hernandez-Camba, A
Ferrer, CS
Rodríguez-Lago, I
Piqueras, M
Castaño, A
Ramos, L
Sobrino, A
Rodríguez-Grau, MC
Elosua, A
Montoro-Huguet, MA
Baltar, R
Huguet, JM
Hermida, B
Caballero-Mateos, A
Sánchez-Guillén, L
Bouhmidi, A
Pajares, R
Baston-Rey, I
López-Sanromán, A
Albillos, A
Acosta, MBD
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv biological therapy
Crohn's disease of the pouch
pouchitis
topic biological therapy
Crohn's disease of the pouch
pouchitis
description Background: Inflammatory pouch disorders can be refractory to conventional therapy. Evidence on biological therapy from large cohorts is scarce. Objective: To explore the use and effectiveness of biological therapy for inflammatory pouch disorders. Design: A retrospective and multicentre study. Methods: We included patients diagnosed with pouchitis, Crohn's Disease of the Pouch (CDP) or cuffitis and treated with biological therapy. Effectiveness was evaluated at 12 months based on normalisation of stool frequency, absence of pain, faecal urgency or fistula discharge (clinical remission), or as any improvement in these symptoms (clinical response). We also compared the effectiveness of a second biologic after anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) failure using descriptive and comparative statistics. Results: In total, 145 patients were included; 62% were men and the median age was 54 (20-71) years. Overall, 212 lines of treatment were evaluated (95 infliximab, 69 adalimumab, 7 golimumab, 35 vedolizumab and 26 ustekinumab). At least a second line of treatment was received by 41% of patients. Overall, 66% had chronic pouchitis and 29% had CDP. Clinical remission rates at 12 months were 45%, 44%, 43%, 39% and 45% for infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab and ustekinumab, respectively. No differences were found based on the type of disease. Vedolizumab was the only treatment to show better results as a first-line therapy (50% vs 33%, p < 0.05). Thirty-nine patients received a second therapy after anti-TNF failure. Second anti-TNF use had higher risks of failure (odds ratio (OR) 4.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3-19) and discontinuation (OR 5.52, 95% CI 1.94-25.5). Conclusion: Biological therapy is a cornerstone in the treatment of pouch disorders, demonstrating consistently high effectiveness. After anti-TNF failure, another mechanism of action should be employed.
publishDate 2026
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2026
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://fisabio.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/20577
url https://fisabio.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/20577
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
ISSN: 1756283X
ISSNe: 17562848
reponame:r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica
instname:Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)
instname_str Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)
reponame_str r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica
collection r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869404003500032000
score 15,198674