L’oblit: una definició filosòfica
The purpose of this article is to make a definition of the notion “oblivion” from a philosophical point of view. What would be the key issues that characterize oblivion as a symbolic operator in the work of memories reconfiguration? We will approach this subject from four main perspectives: the cate...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositorio: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:20.500.14342/1687 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/1687 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Educació - Filosofia Memòria |
| Sumario: | The purpose of this article is to make a definition of the notion “oblivion” from a philosophical point of view. What would be the key issues that characterize oblivion as a symbolic operator in the work of memories reconfiguration? We will approach this subject from four main perspectives: the category of “not-all” in Jacques Lacan and Jean-Claude Milner works, which makes memory a not inclusive totality; the category “parresia” in Michel Foucault defining the relation between subject and truth in Ancient times; the category of “denial”(Verneinung) in the reading of Freud’s work by Jean Hyppolite; finally, the category “relational” referring to the intimate proximity with oblivion that post-feminists contributions have highlighted. These four categories can be considered a conceptual and speculative system to be applied to the study and analysis of the different models of cultural, individual and collective memories and their ways of reconfiguring the past. |
|---|