Analysis of the Use and Applicability of Different Variables for the Prescription of Relative Intensity in Bench Press Exercise

The aim of the study was to analyze the use of variables such as % of one-repetition maximum (1RM) and number of maximal repetitions (xRM) with execution velocity to define and control the intensity of resistance training in bench press exercise. Hence, exercise professionals will achieve better con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Maté Muñoz, José Luis, Garnacho Castaño, Manuel Vicente, Hernández Lougedo, Juan, Maicas Pérez, Luis, Notario Alonso, Raúl, Da Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo Edir, García Fernández, Pablo, Heredia-Elvar, Juan Ramón
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2022
País:España
Institución:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Repositorio:Docta Complutense
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/72286
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/72286
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:796:615.83
Strength
Sport performance
Human performance
Velocity
Load
Training
Repetitions
Fatigue
Fisioterapia (Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología)
3213.11 Fisioterapia
id ES_170fd2d475dcc1cc5f7c2fc02d6ea50f
oai_identifier_str oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/72286
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Analysis of the Use and Applicability of Different Variables for the Prescription of Relative Intensity in Bench Press ExerciseMaté Muñoz, José LuisGarnacho Castaño, Manuel VicenteHernández Lougedo, JuanMaicas Pérez, LuisNotario Alonso, RaúlDa Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo EdirGarcía Fernández, PabloHeredia-Elvar, Juan Ramón796:615.83StrengthSport performanceHuman performanceVelocityLoadTrainingRepetitionsFatigueFisioterapia (Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología)3213.11 FisioterapiaThe aim of the study was to analyze the use of variables such as % of one-repetition maximum (1RM) and number of maximal repetitions (xRM) with execution velocity to define and control the intensity of resistance training in bench press exercise. Hence, exercise professionals will achieve better control of training through a greater understanding of its variables. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, fifty male physical education students were divided into four groups according to their relative strength ratio (RSR) and performed a 1RM bench press test (T1). In the second test, participants performed repetitions to exhaustion (T2), using a relative load corresponding to 70% 1RM determined through the mean propulsive velocity (MPV) obtained from the individual load–velocity relationship. This same test was repeated a week later (T3). Tests were monitored according to the MPV of each repetition and blood lactate values (LACT). Results: Regarding MPV, the best (fastest) repetition of the set (MPVrep Best) values were similar between groups (0.62 m·s−1–0.64 m·s−1), with significant differences in relation to the high RSR group (p < 0.001). The average maximum number of repetitions (MNR) was 12.38 ± 2.51, with no significant differences between the RSR groups. Nonetheless, significant variation existed between groups with regards to MNR (CV: 13–29%), with greater variability in the group corresponding to the lowest RSR values (CV: 29%). The loss of velocity in the MNR test in the different groups was similar (p > 0.05). Average LACT values (5.72 mmol·L−1) showed significant differences between the Background: Medium RSR and Very Low RSR groups. No significant differences were found (p > 0.05) between T2 and T3 with regards to MNR, MPVrep Best, or MPVrep Last, with little variability seen between participants. Conclusions: The use of variables such as the 1RM, estimated using an absolute load value, or an MNR do not allow an adequate degree of precision to prescribe and control the relative intensity of resistance training. Besides, execution velocity control can offer an adequate alternative to guarantee an accurate prescription of intensity with regard to resistance training.MDPIUniversidad Complutense de Madrid20222022-02-1720222022-02-17journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/72286reponame:Docta Complutenseinstname:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)Inglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Atribución 3.0 Españahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/722862026-06-02T12:44:21Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of the Use and Applicability of Different Variables for the Prescription of Relative Intensity in Bench Press Exercise
title Analysis of the Use and Applicability of Different Variables for the Prescription of Relative Intensity in Bench Press Exercise
spellingShingle Analysis of the Use and Applicability of Different Variables for the Prescription of Relative Intensity in Bench Press Exercise
Maté Muñoz, José Luis
796:615.83
Strength
Sport performance
Human performance
Velocity
Load
Training
Repetitions
Fatigue
Fisioterapia (Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología)
3213.11 Fisioterapia
title_short Analysis of the Use and Applicability of Different Variables for the Prescription of Relative Intensity in Bench Press Exercise
title_full Analysis of the Use and Applicability of Different Variables for the Prescription of Relative Intensity in Bench Press Exercise
title_fullStr Analysis of the Use and Applicability of Different Variables for the Prescription of Relative Intensity in Bench Press Exercise
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the Use and Applicability of Different Variables for the Prescription of Relative Intensity in Bench Press Exercise
title_sort Analysis of the Use and Applicability of Different Variables for the Prescription of Relative Intensity in Bench Press Exercise
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Maté Muñoz, José Luis
Garnacho Castaño, Manuel Vicente
Hernández Lougedo, Juan
Maicas Pérez, Luis
Notario Alonso, Raúl
Da Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo Edir
García Fernández, Pablo
Heredia-Elvar, Juan Ramón
author Maté Muñoz, José Luis
author_facet Maté Muñoz, José Luis
Garnacho Castaño, Manuel Vicente
Hernández Lougedo, Juan
Maicas Pérez, Luis
Notario Alonso, Raúl
Da Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo Edir
García Fernández, Pablo
Heredia-Elvar, Juan Ramón
author_role author
author2 Garnacho Castaño, Manuel Vicente
Hernández Lougedo, Juan
Maicas Pérez, Luis
Notario Alonso, Raúl
Da Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo Edir
García Fernández, Pablo
Heredia-Elvar, Juan Ramón
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Complutense de Madrid
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv 796:615.83
Strength
Sport performance
Human performance
Velocity
Load
Training
Repetitions
Fatigue
Fisioterapia (Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología)
3213.11 Fisioterapia
topic 796:615.83
Strength
Sport performance
Human performance
Velocity
Load
Training
Repetitions
Fatigue
Fisioterapia (Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología)
3213.11 Fisioterapia
description The aim of the study was to analyze the use of variables such as % of one-repetition maximum (1RM) and number of maximal repetitions (xRM) with execution velocity to define and control the intensity of resistance training in bench press exercise. Hence, exercise professionals will achieve better control of training through a greater understanding of its variables. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, fifty male physical education students were divided into four groups according to their relative strength ratio (RSR) and performed a 1RM bench press test (T1). In the second test, participants performed repetitions to exhaustion (T2), using a relative load corresponding to 70% 1RM determined through the mean propulsive velocity (MPV) obtained from the individual load–velocity relationship. This same test was repeated a week later (T3). Tests were monitored according to the MPV of each repetition and blood lactate values (LACT). Results: Regarding MPV, the best (fastest) repetition of the set (MPVrep Best) values were similar between groups (0.62 m·s−1–0.64 m·s−1), with significant differences in relation to the high RSR group (p < 0.001). The average maximum number of repetitions (MNR) was 12.38 ± 2.51, with no significant differences between the RSR groups. Nonetheless, significant variation existed between groups with regards to MNR (CV: 13–29%), with greater variability in the group corresponding to the lowest RSR values (CV: 29%). The loss of velocity in the MNR test in the different groups was similar (p > 0.05). Average LACT values (5.72 mmol·L−1) showed significant differences between the Background: Medium RSR and Very Low RSR groups. No significant differences were found (p > 0.05) between T2 and T3 with regards to MNR, MPVrep Best, or MPVrep Last, with little variability seen between participants. Conclusions: The use of variables such as the 1RM, estimated using an absolute load value, or an MNR do not allow an adequate degree of precision to prescribe and control the relative intensity of resistance training. Besides, execution velocity control can offer an adequate alternative to guarantee an accurate prescription of intensity with regard to resistance training.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
2022-02-17
2022
2022-02-17
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv journal article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/72286
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/72286
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Atribución 3.0 España
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Atribución 3.0 España
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Docta Complutense
instname:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
instname_str Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
reponame_str Docta Complutense
collection Docta Complutense
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869403897975537664
score 15,301603

Similares en LA Referencia