Fault detection in induction machines using learning models and fourier spectrum image analysis
Induction motors are essential components in industry due to their efficiency and cost-effectiveness. This study presents an innovative methodology for automatic fault detection by analyzing images generated from the Fourier spectra of current signals using deep learning techniques. A new preprocess...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) |
| Repositorio: | UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/457125 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://hdl.handle.net/2117/457125 https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s25020471 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Fault diagnosis Induction motors Spectral images Deep learning Explainability Predictive maintenance Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria mecànica::Motors |
| Resumo: | Induction motors are essential components in industry due to their efficiency and cost-effectiveness. This study presents an innovative methodology for automatic fault detection by analyzing images generated from the Fourier spectra of current signals using deep learning techniques. A new preprocessing technique incorporating a distinctive background to enhance spectral feature learning is proposed, enabling the detection of four types of faults: healthy motor coupled to a generator with a broken bar (HGB), broken rotor bar (BRB), race bearing fault (RBF), and bearing ball fault (BBF). The dataset was generated from three-phase signals of an induction motor controlled by a Direct Torque Controller under various operating conditions (20–1500 rpm with 0–100% load), resulting in 4251 images. The model, based on a Visual Geometry Group (VGG) architecture with 19 layers, achieved an overall accuracy of 98%, with specific accuracies of 99% for RAF, 100% for BRB, 100% for RBF, and 95% for BBF. A new model interpretability was assessed using explainability techniques, which allowed for the identification of specific learning patterns. This analysis introduces a new approach by demonstrating how different convolutional blocks capture particular features: the first convolutional block captures signal shape, while the second identifies background features. Additionally, distinct convolutional layers were associated with each fault type: layer 9 for RAF, layer 13 for BRB, layer 16 for RBF, and layer 14 for BBF. This methodology offers a scalable solution for predictive maintenance in induction motors, effectively combining signal processing, computer vision, and explainability techniques. |
|---|