Personal dosimetry using monte-carlo simulations for occupational dose monitoring in interventional radiology: The results of a proof of concept in a clinical setting

Exposure levels to staff in interventional radiology (IR) may be significant and appropriate assessment of radiation doses is needed. Issues regarding measurements using physical dosemeters in the clinical environment still exist. The objective of this work was to explore the prerequisites for asses...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Almén, Anja, Andersson, Martin, O'Connor, Una, Abdelrahman, Mahmoud, Camp Brunés, Anna|||0000-0002-4736-5598, García Fernández, Víctor Gerardo|||0000-0002-2621-3392, Duch Guillen, María Amor|||0000-0002-1560-1576, Ginjaume Egido, Mercè|||0000-0002-6767-2624, Vanhavere, Filip
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Recursos:Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
Repositorio:UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/360828
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/2117/360828
https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncab045
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Radioactivity--Physiological effect
Physical dosemeters
Nuclear medicine
radiation doses
Radiology
Radioactivitat--Efectes fisiològics
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria biomèdica
Descrição
Resumo:Exposure levels to staff in interventional radiology (IR) may be significant and appropriate assessment of radiation doses is needed. Issues regarding measurements using physical dosemeters in the clinical environment still exist. The objective of this work was to explore the prerequisites for assessing staff radiation dose, based on simulations only. Personal dose equivalent, Hp(10), was assessed using simulations based on Monte Carlo methods. The position of the operator was defined using a 3D motion tracking system. X-ray system exposure parameters were extracted from the x-ray equipment. The methodology was investigated and the simulations compared to measurements during IR procedures. The results indicate that the differences between simulated and measured staff radiation doses, in terms of the personal dose equivalent quantity Hp(10), are in the order of 30–70 %. The results are promising but some issues remain to be solved, e.g. an automated tracking of movable parts such as the ceiling-mounted protection shield.