Restriction by noncontraction

This paper investigates how naive theories of truth fare with respect to a set of extremely plausible principles of restricted quantification. It is first shown that both nonsubstructural theories as well as certain substructural theories cannot validate all those principles. Then, pursuing further...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Zardini, Elia
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2016
País:España
Institución:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Repositorio:Docta Complutense
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/131427
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/131427
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:164
Analetheism
Contraction
Dialetheism
Naive truth
Restricted quantification
Substructural logics
Transitivity
Lógica simbólica y matemática (Filosofía)
1102.03 Lógica Formal
id ES_1312dedad54c4eb0ddc8f5b8d54516fd
oai_identifier_str oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/131427
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Restriction by noncontractionZardini, Elia164AnaletheismContractionDialetheismNaive truthRestricted quantificationSubstructural logicsTransitivityLógica simbólica y matemática (Filosofía)1102.03 Lógica FormalThis paper investigates how naive theories of truth fare with respect to a set of extremely plausible principles of restricted quantification. It is first shown that both nonsubstructural theories as well as certain substructural theories cannot validate all those principles. Then, pursuing further an approach to the semantic paradoxes that the author has defended elsewhere, the theory of restricted quantification available in a specific naive theory that rejects the structural property of contraction is explored. It is shown that the theory validates all the principles in question, and it is argued that other prima facie plausible principles that the theory fails to validate are objectionable on independent grounds.Duke University PressUniversidad Complutense de Madrid20162016-01-0120162016-01-01journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501VoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/131427reponame:Docta Complutenseinstname:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)InglésengMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004837 Not available FFI2011-25626 REFERENCE, SELF REFERENCE AND EMPIRICAL DATAMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003329 Not available FFI2012-35026 THE MAKINGS OF TRUTH: NATURE, EXTENT, AND APPLICATIONS OF TRUTHMAKINGopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/1314272026-06-02T12:44:21Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Restriction by noncontraction
title Restriction by noncontraction
spellingShingle Restriction by noncontraction
Zardini, Elia
164
Analetheism
Contraction
Dialetheism
Naive truth
Restricted quantification
Substructural logics
Transitivity
Lógica simbólica y matemática (Filosofía)
1102.03 Lógica Formal
title_short Restriction by noncontraction
title_full Restriction by noncontraction
title_fullStr Restriction by noncontraction
title_full_unstemmed Restriction by noncontraction
title_sort Restriction by noncontraction
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Zardini, Elia
author Zardini, Elia
author_facet Zardini, Elia
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Complutense de Madrid
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv 164
Analetheism
Contraction
Dialetheism
Naive truth
Restricted quantification
Substructural logics
Transitivity
Lógica simbólica y matemática (Filosofía)
1102.03 Lógica Formal
topic 164
Analetheism
Contraction
Dialetheism
Naive truth
Restricted quantification
Substructural logics
Transitivity
Lógica simbólica y matemática (Filosofía)
1102.03 Lógica Formal
description This paper investigates how naive theories of truth fare with respect to a set of extremely plausible principles of restricted quantification. It is first shown that both nonsubstructural theories as well as certain substructural theories cannot validate all those principles. Then, pursuing further an approach to the semantic paradoxes that the author has defended elsewhere, the theory of restricted quantification available in a specific naive theory that rejects the structural property of contraction is explored. It is shown that the theory validates all the principles in question, and it is argued that other prima facie plausible principles that the theory fails to validate are objectionable on independent grounds.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
2016-01-01
2016
2016-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv journal article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
VoR
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/131427
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/131427
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004837 Not available FFI2011-25626 REFERENCE, SELF REFERENCE AND EMPIRICAL DATA
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003329 Not available FFI2012-35026 THE MAKINGS OF TRUTH: NATURE, EXTENT, AND APPLICATIONS OF TRUTHMAKING
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Duke University Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Duke University Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Docta Complutense
instname:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
instname_str Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
reponame_str Docta Complutense
collection Docta Complutense
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869403654935543808
score 15,812429