On the n-Color Weak Rado Numbers for the Equation x1 + x2 + ··· + xk + c = xk +1

For integers k, n, c with k, n ≥ 1, the n-color Rado number Rk(n, c) is defined to be the least integer N, if it exists or ∞ otherwise, such that for every n-coloring of the set {1, 2,...,N}, there exists a monochromatic solution in that set to the equation x1 + x2 + ··· + xk + c = xk+1. In this pap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Adhikari, S. D., Boza Prieto, Luis, Eliahou, Shalom, Marín Sánchez, Juan Manuel, Revuelta Marchena, María Pastora, Sanz Domínguez, María Isabel
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2016
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Sevilla (US)
Repositorio:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
OAI Identifier:oai:idus.us.es:11441/136594
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/11441/136594
https://doi.org/10.1090/mcom3034
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Schur numbers
Sum-free sets
Rado numbers
Boolean variables
SAT problem
SAT-solvers
Descripción
Sumario:For integers k, n, c with k, n ≥ 1, the n-color Rado number Rk(n, c) is defined to be the least integer N, if it exists or ∞ otherwise, such that for every n-coloring of the set {1, 2,...,N}, there exists a monochromatic solution in that set to the equation x1 + x2 + ··· + xk + c = xk+1. In this paper, we mostly restrict to the case c ≥ 0, and consider two main issues regarding Rk(n, c): is it finite or infinite, and when finite, what is its value? Very few results are known so far on either one. On the first issue, we formulate a general conjecture, namely that Rk(n, c) should be finite if and only if every divisor d ≤ n of k − 1 also divides c. The “only if” part of the conjecture is shown to hold, as well as the “if” part in the cases where either k − 1 divides c, or n ≥ k − 1, or k ≤ 7, except for two instances to be published separately. On the second issue, we obtain new bounds on Rk(n, c) and determine exact formulae in several new cases, including R3(3, c) and R4(3, c). As for the case R2(3, c), first settled by Schaal in 1995, we provide a new shorter proof. Finally, the problem is reformulated as a Boolean satisfiability problem, allowing the use of a SAT solver to treat some instances.