Reliability of a visual analog scale for determining the preferred mastication side.

Statement of problem: Although the visual analog scale (VAS) is a simple tool for quantitatively measuring symptom perception, no studies have used the VAS to assess the degree of subjective masticatory laterality. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of the VAS for deter...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Flores Orozco, Elan Ignacio, Rovira Lastra, Bernat, Peraire Ardèvol, Maria, Salsench Cabré, Juan, Martínez Gomis, Jordi
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Fecha de publicación:2016
País:España
Recursos:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:2445/110544
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/2445/110544
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Cinesiologia
Masticació
Odontologia
Maxil·lars
Lateralitat
Dominància cerebral
Kinesiology
Mastication
Dentistry
Jaws
Laterality
Cerebral dominance
id ES_1286d3dccbf2e84750647883d76e3003
oai_identifier_str oai:recercat.cat:2445/110544
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Reliability of a visual analog scale for determining the preferred mastication side.Flores Orozco, Elan IgnacioRovira Lastra, BernatPeraire Ardèvol, MariaSalsench Cabré, JuanMartínez Gomis, JordiCinesiologiaMasticacióOdontologiaMaxil·larsLateralitatDominància cerebralKinesiologyMasticationDentistryJawsLateralityCerebral dominanceStatement of problem: Although the visual analog scale (VAS) is a simple tool for quantitatively measuring symptom perception, no studies have used the VAS to assess the degree of subjective masticatory laterality. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of the VAS for determining the preferred mastication side (PMS) and to compare it with other methods. Material and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in which 42 adults with natural dentition performed 2 masticatory sessions. Eight different methods were used to determine the PMS by combining different definitions, food tests, measurements, and number of cycles assessed. A test-retest was performed in 10 participants to evaluate the reliability of each method using the intraclass correlation coefficient. To assess the validity of the different methods, the Pearson correlations were performed (α=.05) between the 8 methods. Results: Self-assessment using the VAS had the highest reliability; it also had a positive and significant relationship with 6 of the 7 other methods. The method that showed the best validity used bagged silicone as the test food, determined the PMS by video recording, and assessed all masticatory cycles using the asymmetry index. Low reliability was found for methods using the location of gum bolus at standardized time intervals or electromyographic recordings. Conclusions: The VAS provided a highly reliable means of assessing the degree of masticatory laterality perceived by the participant, with a positive and significant correlation with the majority of the other methods.Elsevier2017201720162017info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion6 p.application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/110544Articles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia)reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.07.006Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2016, vol. 115, num. 2, p. 203-208https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.07.006cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2016http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/esinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:2445/1105442026-05-29T05:05:01Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reliability of a visual analog scale for determining the preferred mastication side.
title Reliability of a visual analog scale for determining the preferred mastication side.
spellingShingle Reliability of a visual analog scale for determining the preferred mastication side.
Flores Orozco, Elan Ignacio
Cinesiologia
Masticació
Odontologia
Maxil·lars
Lateralitat
Dominància cerebral
Kinesiology
Mastication
Dentistry
Jaws
Laterality
Cerebral dominance
title_short Reliability of a visual analog scale for determining the preferred mastication side.
title_full Reliability of a visual analog scale for determining the preferred mastication side.
title_fullStr Reliability of a visual analog scale for determining the preferred mastication side.
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of a visual analog scale for determining the preferred mastication side.
title_sort Reliability of a visual analog scale for determining the preferred mastication side.
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Flores Orozco, Elan Ignacio
Rovira Lastra, Bernat
Peraire Ardèvol, Maria
Salsench Cabré, Juan
Martínez Gomis, Jordi
author Flores Orozco, Elan Ignacio
author_facet Flores Orozco, Elan Ignacio
Rovira Lastra, Bernat
Peraire Ardèvol, Maria
Salsench Cabré, Juan
Martínez Gomis, Jordi
author_role author
author2 Rovira Lastra, Bernat
Peraire Ardèvol, Maria
Salsench Cabré, Juan
Martínez Gomis, Jordi
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Cinesiologia
Masticació
Odontologia
Maxil·lars
Lateralitat
Dominància cerebral
Kinesiology
Mastication
Dentistry
Jaws
Laterality
Cerebral dominance
topic Cinesiologia
Masticació
Odontologia
Maxil·lars
Lateralitat
Dominància cerebral
Kinesiology
Mastication
Dentistry
Jaws
Laterality
Cerebral dominance
description Statement of problem: Although the visual analog scale (VAS) is a simple tool for quantitatively measuring symptom perception, no studies have used the VAS to assess the degree of subjective masticatory laterality. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of the VAS for determining the preferred mastication side (PMS) and to compare it with other methods. Material and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in which 42 adults with natural dentition performed 2 masticatory sessions. Eight different methods were used to determine the PMS by combining different definitions, food tests, measurements, and number of cycles assessed. A test-retest was performed in 10 participants to evaluate the reliability of each method using the intraclass correlation coefficient. To assess the validity of the different methods, the Pearson correlations were performed (α=.05) between the 8 methods. Results: Self-assessment using the VAS had the highest reliability; it also had a positive and significant relationship with 6 of the 7 other methods. The method that showed the best validity used bagged silicone as the test food, determined the PMS by video recording, and assessed all masticatory cycles using the asymmetry index. Low reliability was found for methods using the location of gum bolus at standardized time intervals or electromyographic recordings. Conclusions: The VAS provided a highly reliable means of assessing the degree of masticatory laterality perceived by the participant, with a positive and significant correlation with the majority of the other methods.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
2017
2017
2017
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format article
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/2445/110544
url https://hdl.handle.net/2445/110544
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.07.006
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2016, vol. 115, num. 2, p. 203-208
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.07.006
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2016
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2016
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 6 p.
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Articles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia)
reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
instname_str Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
reponame_str Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
collection Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869403623728873472
score 15,81155

Registos relacionados