L'organització de l'activitat conjunta i el pensament del professorat sobre l'acció docent en educació física escolar
Teacher thinking and teaching action of a PE teacher in organising joint activities is studied. The theoretical and methodological bases are founded on principles of the ecological paradigm, the perspective of the reflective practitioner, the perspective of the situated action and the sociocultural-...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | tesis doctoral |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2012 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | CBUC, CESCA |
| Repositorio: | TDR. Tesis Doctorales en Red |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:www.tdx.cat:10803/84060 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10803/84060 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Educació física Physical education and training Educación física Investigació-acció en l'educació Action research in education Investigación acción en educación Constructivisme en educació Constructivism in education Constructivismo en educación Professors Teachers Profesores 159.9 371 |
| Sumario: | Teacher thinking and teaching action of a PE teacher in organising joint activities is studied. The theoretical and methodological bases are founded on principles of the ecological paradigm, the perspective of the reflective practitioner, the perspective of the situated action and the sociocultural-orientated constructivism. The “constructivist conception of school teaching and learning” is adopted to analyse the relationships in the interactive triangle on which thinking is analysed. To study the organization of joint activities, analysing the interactivity process has been adopted. To find out and analyse teacher’s thinking, self-confrontation interviews have been carried out and discourse analysis has been adopted. Is revealed that: the organisation of joint activity represents a suitable scenario for the study of teacher thinking, thinking about these actions enables to identify conditions that govern teaching actions, this is determined and governed by both the immediate, unpredictable and uncertain nature of the interactivity situations and the teacher’s implicit theories, and that thinking in action and thinking on action are very often different. |
|---|