Mediterranean diet and healthy eating in subjects with prediabetes from the mollerussa prospective observational cohort study

We aimed to assess differences in dietary patterns (i.e., Mediterranean diet and healthy eating indexes) between participants with prediabetes and those with normal glucose tolerance. Secondarily, we analyzed factors related to prediabetes and dietary patterns. This was a cross-sec-tional study desi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Falguera, Mireia|||0000-0002-7846-8952, Castelblanco, Esmeralda|||0000-0002-2061-6270, Rojo López, Marina Idalia|||0000-0001-6748-3156, Vilanova, Maria Belén|||0000-0002-9338-9048, Real, Jordi|||0000-0002-5979-8948, Alcubierre, Nuria|||0000-0001-6245-3599, Miró, Neus, Molló, Àngels, Mata-Cases, Manel|||0000-0003-3693-3622, Franch-Nadal, Josep|||0000-0002-5175-1555, Granado-Casas, Minerva|||0000-0003-3447-5728, Mauricio, Didac|||0000-0002-2868-0250
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Institución:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:269937
Acceso en línea:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/269937
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.3390/nu13010252
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Prediabetes
Mediterranean diet
Healthy eating
Dietary pattern
Nutrient intake
Physical activity
Descripción
Sumario:We aimed to assess differences in dietary patterns (i.e., Mediterranean diet and healthy eating indexes) between participants with prediabetes and those with normal glucose tolerance. Secondarily, we analyzed factors related to prediabetes and dietary patterns. This was a cross-sec-tional study design. From a sample of 594 participants recruited in the Mollerussa study cohort, a total of 535 participants (216 with prediabetes and 319 with normal glucose tolerance) were in-cluded. The alternate Mediterranean Diet score (aMED) and the alternate Healthy Eating Index (aHEI) were calculated. Bivariable and multivariable analyses were performed. There was no dif-ference in the mean aMED and aHEI scores between groups (3.2 (1.8) in the normoglycemic group and 3.4 (1.8) in the prediabetes group, p = 0.164 for the aMED and 38.6 (7.3) in the normoglycemic group and 38.7 (6.7) in the prediabetes group, p = 0.877 for the aHEI, respectively). Nevertheless, women had a higher mean of aMED and aHEI scores in the prediabetes group (3.7 (1.9), p = 0.001 and 40.5 (6.9), p < 0.001, respectively); moreover, they had a higher mean of aHEI in the group with normoglycemia (39.8 (6.6); p = 0.001). No differences were observed in daily food intake between both study groups; consistent with this finding, we did not find major differences in nutrient intake between groups. In the multivariable analyses, the aMED and aHEI were not associated with pre-diabetes (odds ratio (OR): 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75-1.87; p = 0.460 and OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 0.83-2.10; p = 0.246, respectively); however, age (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.05; p < 0.001), dyslipidemia (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.27-3.22; p = 0.003) and body mass index (BMI) (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.05-1.14; p < 0.001) were positively associated with prediabetes. Physical activity was associated with a lower frequency of prediabetes (OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.31-0.72; p = 0.001). In conclusion, subjects with prediabetes did not show a different dietary pattern compared with a normal glucose tolerance group. However, further research is needed on this issue.