Reply to the Comment on Subsidence analysis of salt tectonics-driven minibasins (Northern Calcareous Alps, Austria), published on Basin research 2020:00: 1-23 doi:10.1111/bre.12500.
We kindly take the opportunity to reply to the comments raised by Schöllnberger (2021) on our recent publication “Subsidence analysis of salt tectonics-driven carbonate minibasins (Northern Calcareous Alps, Austria)“ by Strauss et al. (2020). We here provide a lengthier discussion in relation to the...
| Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Status: | Versión aceptada para publicación |
| Publication Date: | 2021 |
| Country: | España |
| Institution: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repository: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:2445/207844 |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/207844 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | Tectònica salina Geologia estructural Alps Tectonique du sel Structural geology |
| Summary: | We kindly take the opportunity to reply to the comments raised by Schöllnberger (2021) on our recent publication “Subsidence analysis of salt tectonics-driven carbonate minibasins (Northern Calcareous Alps, Austria)“ by Strauss et al. (2020). We here provide a lengthier discussion in relation to the parameters applied to the subsidence modelling phase and the reason for having chosen those; we hope our reply serves to better illustrate the applied methodology, and allow peers to validate and modify it accordingly when applied to other natural case studies. Nicer intro-words would be appreciated, do you have something better and more in mind? Like it better? |
|---|