Compatibly involutive residuated lattices and the Nelson identity

Nelson’s constructive logic with strong negation N3 can be presented (to within definitional equivalence) as the axiomatic extension NInFL ew of the involutive full Lambek calculus with exchange and weakening by the Nelson axiom[Figure not available: see fulltext.] The algebraic counterpart of NInFL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Matthew Spinks, Rivieccio, Umberto, Nascimento, Thiago
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2018
País:España
Institución:Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
Repositorio:e-spacio. Repositorio Institucional de la UNED
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:e-spacio.uned.es:20.500.14468/24645
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14468/24645
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:11 Lógica
Nelson algebra
Nelson logic
compatibly involutive residuated lattices
congruence orderable
Fregean
id ES_0d81b9f2dcf150e38775dfa2aa2b21fd
oai_identifier_str oai:e-spacio.uned.es:20.500.14468/24645
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Compatibly involutive residuated lattices and the Nelson identityMatthew SpinksRivieccio, UmbertoNascimento, Thiago11 LógicaNelson algebraNelson logiccompatibly involutive residuated latticescongruence orderableFregeanNelson’s constructive logic with strong negation N3 can be presented (to within definitional equivalence) as the axiomatic extension NInFL ew of the involutive full Lambek calculus with exchange and weakening by the Nelson axiom[Figure not available: see fulltext.] The algebraic counterpart of NInFL ew is the recently introduced class of Nelson residuated lattices. These are commutative integral bounded residuated lattices ⟨ A; ∧ , ∨ , ∗ , ⇒ , 0 , 1 ⟩ that: (i) are compatibly involutive in the sense that ∼ ∼ a= a for all a∈ A, where ∼ a: = a⇒ 0 , and (ii) satisfy the Nelson identity, namely the algebraic analogue of (Nelson ⊢ ), viz.(x⇒(x⇒y))∧(∼y⇒(∼y⇒∼x))≈x⇒y.The present paper focuses on the role played by the Nelson identity in the context of compatibly involutive commutative integral bounded residuated lattices. We present several characterisations of the identity (Nelson) in this setting, which variously permit us to comprehend its model-theoretic content from order-theoretic, syntactic, and congruence-theoretic perspectives. Notably, we show that a compatibly involutive commutative integral bounded residuated lattice A is a Nelson residuated lattice iff for all a, b∈ A, the congruence condition ΘA(0,a)=ΘA(0,b)andΘA(1,a)=ΘA(1,b)impliesa=bholds. This observation, together with others of the main results, opens the door to studying the characteristic property of Nelson residuated lattices (and hence Nelson’s constructive logic with strong negation) from a purely abstract perspective.Springer Naturee-Spacio UNED20242024-12-0220182018-11-0320182018-11-03journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14468/24645reponame:e-spacio. Repositorio Institucional de la UNEDinstname:Universidad Nacional de Educación a DistanciaInglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.esoai:e-spacio.uned.es:20.500.14468/246452026-06-06T12:38:31Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Compatibly involutive residuated lattices and the Nelson identity
title Compatibly involutive residuated lattices and the Nelson identity
spellingShingle Compatibly involutive residuated lattices and the Nelson identity
Matthew Spinks
11 Lógica
Nelson algebra
Nelson logic
compatibly involutive residuated lattices
congruence orderable
Fregean
title_short Compatibly involutive residuated lattices and the Nelson identity
title_full Compatibly involutive residuated lattices and the Nelson identity
title_fullStr Compatibly involutive residuated lattices and the Nelson identity
title_full_unstemmed Compatibly involutive residuated lattices and the Nelson identity
title_sort Compatibly involutive residuated lattices and the Nelson identity
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Matthew Spinks
Rivieccio, Umberto
Nascimento, Thiago
author Matthew Spinks
author_facet Matthew Spinks
Rivieccio, Umberto
Nascimento, Thiago
author_role author
author2 Rivieccio, Umberto
Nascimento, Thiago
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv e-Spacio UNED
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv 11 Lógica
Nelson algebra
Nelson logic
compatibly involutive residuated lattices
congruence orderable
Fregean
topic 11 Lógica
Nelson algebra
Nelson logic
compatibly involutive residuated lattices
congruence orderable
Fregean
description Nelson’s constructive logic with strong negation N3 can be presented (to within definitional equivalence) as the axiomatic extension NInFL ew of the involutive full Lambek calculus with exchange and weakening by the Nelson axiom[Figure not available: see fulltext.] The algebraic counterpart of NInFL ew is the recently introduced class of Nelson residuated lattices. These are commutative integral bounded residuated lattices ⟨ A; ∧ , ∨ , ∗ , ⇒ , 0 , 1 ⟩ that: (i) are compatibly involutive in the sense that ∼ ∼ a= a for all a∈ A, where ∼ a: = a⇒ 0 , and (ii) satisfy the Nelson identity, namely the algebraic analogue of (Nelson ⊢ ), viz.(x⇒(x⇒y))∧(∼y⇒(∼y⇒∼x))≈x⇒y.The present paper focuses on the role played by the Nelson identity in the context of compatibly involutive commutative integral bounded residuated lattices. We present several characterisations of the identity (Nelson) in this setting, which variously permit us to comprehend its model-theoretic content from order-theoretic, syntactic, and congruence-theoretic perspectives. Notably, we show that a compatibly involutive commutative integral bounded residuated lattice A is a Nelson residuated lattice iff for all a, b∈ A, the congruence condition ΘA(0,a)=ΘA(0,b)andΘA(1,a)=ΘA(1,b)impliesa=bholds. This observation, together with others of the main results, opens the door to studying the characteristic property of Nelson residuated lattices (and hence Nelson’s constructive logic with strong negation) from a purely abstract perspective.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018
2018-11-03
2018
2018-11-03
2024
2024-12-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv journal article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14468/24645
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14468/24645
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Nature
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Nature
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:e-spacio. Repositorio Institucional de la UNED
instname:Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
instname_str Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
reponame_str e-spacio. Repositorio Institucional de la UNED
collection e-spacio. Repositorio Institucional de la UNED
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869403343763275776
score 15,812429