The principle of orality in the German administrative jurisdiction: is there more protection of the ius litigatoris if there are less written acts?

Orality is one of the essential principles of modern judicial proceedings. This study analyzes the historical evolution and the current scope of operation of the principle of orality in the German contentious-administrative jurisdiction. It deals with its genesis in the mid-19th century and its form...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Buchhalter Montero, Brian
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Asamblea de Madrid
Repositorio:Asamblea. Revista Parlamentaria de la Asamblea de Madrid
OAI Identifier:oai:revista.asambleamadrid.es:article/978
Acceso en línea:https://revista.asambleamadrid.es/index.php/rvam/article/view/978
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Historia
Jurisdicción
contencioso-administrativo
oralidad
Alemania
derecho comparado
Administrative
Law Jurisdiction
orality
Germany
History
id ES_0cb18d3a434e4eb776e508325a0fd4e1
oai_identifier_str oai:revista.asambleamadrid.es:article/978
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling The principle of orality in the German administrative jurisdiction: is there more protection of the ius litigatoris if there are less written acts?El principio de oralidad en la jurisdicción contencioso-administrativa alemana: ¿hay más tutela del ius litigatoris a menos escritura?Buchhalter Montero, BrianHistoriaJurisdiccióncontencioso-administrativooralidadAlemaniaderecho comparadoAdministrativeLaw JurisdictionoralityGermanyHistoryOrality is one of the essential principles of modern judicial proceedings. This study analyzes the historical evolution and the current scope of operation of the principle of orality in the German contentious-administrative jurisdiction. It deals with its genesis in the mid-19th century and its formation up to the current regulation, contained in the Law on Contentious-Administrative Jurisdiction of 1960. At the current regulatory regime, the study addresses some exceptions to orality, such as the waiver of the parties, as well as the virtuality of the principle in the second instance.La oralidad es uno de los principios esenciales de los procesos judiciales modernos. Este estudio analiza la evolución histórica y el ámbito de operatividad actual del principio de oralidad en la jurisdicción contencioso-administrativa alemana, Se trata de abordar su génesis a mitad del siglo XIX y su formación hasta llegar a la actual regulación, contenida en la Ley de la Jurisdicción Contencioso-Administrativa, de 1960. Llegados al régimen normativo actual, el estudio aborda algunas excepciones a la oralidad, tales como la renuncia de las partes, así como la virtualidad del principio en segunda instancia.Asamblea de Madrid2024info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtículo evaluado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://revista.asambleamadrid.es/index.php/rvam/article/view/978Asamblea. Revista parlamentaria de la Asamblea de Madrid; Núm. 46 (2024); 103-1322951-665X1575-531210.59991/rvam/2024/n.46reponame:Asamblea. Revista Parlamentaria de la Asamblea de Madridinstname:Asamblea de MadridEspañolhttps://revista.asambleamadrid.es/index.php/rvam/article/view/978/1010Derechos de autor 2024 Asamblea de Madridhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revista.asambleamadrid.es:article/9782026-06-18T08:18:47Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The principle of orality in the German administrative jurisdiction: is there more protection of the ius litigatoris if there are less written acts?
El principio de oralidad en la jurisdicción contencioso-administrativa alemana: ¿hay más tutela del ius litigatoris a menos escritura?
title The principle of orality in the German administrative jurisdiction: is there more protection of the ius litigatoris if there are less written acts?
spellingShingle The principle of orality in the German administrative jurisdiction: is there more protection of the ius litigatoris if there are less written acts?
Buchhalter Montero, Brian
Historia
Jurisdicción
contencioso-administrativo
oralidad
Alemania
derecho comparado
Administrative
Law Jurisdiction
orality
Germany
History
title_short The principle of orality in the German administrative jurisdiction: is there more protection of the ius litigatoris if there are less written acts?
title_full The principle of orality in the German administrative jurisdiction: is there more protection of the ius litigatoris if there are less written acts?
title_fullStr The principle of orality in the German administrative jurisdiction: is there more protection of the ius litigatoris if there are less written acts?
title_full_unstemmed The principle of orality in the German administrative jurisdiction: is there more protection of the ius litigatoris if there are less written acts?
title_sort The principle of orality in the German administrative jurisdiction: is there more protection of the ius litigatoris if there are less written acts?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Buchhalter Montero, Brian
author Buchhalter Montero, Brian
author_facet Buchhalter Montero, Brian
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Historia
Jurisdicción
contencioso-administrativo
oralidad
Alemania
derecho comparado
Administrative
Law Jurisdiction
orality
Germany
History
topic Historia
Jurisdicción
contencioso-administrativo
oralidad
Alemania
derecho comparado
Administrative
Law Jurisdiction
orality
Germany
History
description Orality is one of the essential principles of modern judicial proceedings. This study analyzes the historical evolution and the current scope of operation of the principle of orality in the German contentious-administrative jurisdiction. It deals with its genesis in the mid-19th century and its formation up to the current regulation, contained in the Law on Contentious-Administrative Jurisdiction of 1960. At the current regulatory regime, the study addresses some exceptions to orality, such as the waiver of the parties, as well as the virtuality of the principle in the second instance.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artículo evaluado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.asambleamadrid.es/index.php/rvam/article/view/978
url https://revista.asambleamadrid.es/index.php/rvam/article/view/978
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Español
language_invalid_str_mv Español
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.asambleamadrid.es/index.php/rvam/article/view/978/1010
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2024 Asamblea de Madrid
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2024 Asamblea de Madrid
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Asamblea de Madrid
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Asamblea de Madrid
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Asamblea. Revista parlamentaria de la Asamblea de Madrid; Núm. 46 (2024); 103-132
2951-665X
1575-5312
10.59991/rvam/2024/n.46
reponame:Asamblea. Revista Parlamentaria de la Asamblea de Madrid
instname:Asamblea de Madrid
instname_str Asamblea de Madrid
reponame_str Asamblea. Revista Parlamentaria de la Asamblea de Madrid
collection Asamblea. Revista Parlamentaria de la Asamblea de Madrid
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869403298464792576
score 15,811543

Similares en LA Referencia