A reappraisal of the type series of the early Cretaceous margaritiferid ‘Unio’ valdensis Mantell, 1844
[EN] This study re-examines the type series of the Early Cretaceous freshwater bivalve Unio valdensis Mantell, 1844, in relation to the assignment of the species to the genus Paraheudeana Starobogatov (1970), and the subgenus Pseudunio by Mongin (1961). For the first time, we recognise the type spec...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión aceptada para publicación |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| Repositorio: | DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digital.csic.es:10261/344310 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/344310 https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85065620496 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Bivalvia Early Cretaceous Europe Margaritifera Taxonomy Wealden |
| Sumario: | [EN] This study re-examines the type series of the Early Cretaceous freshwater bivalve Unio valdensis Mantell, 1844, in relation to the assignment of the species to the genus Paraheudeana Starobogatov (1970), and the subgenus Pseudunio by Mongin (1961). For the first time, we recognise the type specimens as incomplete lacking critical posterior portions of the shell. We observe that the lectotype, superficially oval in outline, has a shallow, but distinct postero-ventral sinus, seemingly out-grown, the broken ventral margin not preserving actual shell shape or the commissure. Significantly, many other specimens confirm the presence of the postero-ventral sinus and elongate-oval outline. It is unclear why Starobogatov removed Margaritifera (Pseudunio) valdensis but maybe the perceived oval outline was sufficient for separation. Combined with diagnostic characters such as mantle pits, we retain the freshwater mussel Unio valdensis in the genus Margaritifera and refute the validity of the genus Paraheudeana Starobogatov (1970). Araujo et al. (2016) reviewing the phylogeny of the Margaritiferidae, concluded only the genus Margaritifera was valid, discounting Pseudunio as a valid genus or subgenus, placing further doubt upon the use of the then subgenus, conversely more recent studies have supported the genus Pseudunio promoting it to a genus. |
|---|