Acute Effect of Upper-Lower Body Super-Set Vs. Traditional-Set Configurations on Bar Execution Velocity and Volume

This study aimed to compare the effect on bar execution velocity and number of repetitions between two velocity-based resistance training protocols only differing in the set configuration of the full-squat (SQ) and bench-press (BP) exercises. Moderately strength-trained men were assigned to a tradit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Peña García-Orea, Guillermo, Rodríguez Rosell, David, Segarra Carrillo, Daniel, Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo, Belando Pedreño, Noelia
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2022
País:España
Institución:Universidad Pablo de Olavide (UPO)
Repositorio:RIO. Repositorio Institucional Olavide
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:rio.upo.es:10433/25081
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10433/25081
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Set configuration
Neuromuscular performance
Velocity-based training
Resistance training
id ES_0bdd9a606f04c8da2d0cf67e65433db3
oai_identifier_str oai:rio.upo.es:10433/25081
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Acute Effect of Upper-Lower Body Super-Set Vs. Traditional-Set Configurations on Bar Execution Velocity and VolumePeña García-Orea, GuillermoRodríguez Rosell, DavidSegarra Carrillo, DanielEdir Da Silva-Grigoletto, MarzoBelando Pedreño, NoeliaSet configurationNeuromuscular performanceVelocity-based trainingResistance trainingThis study aimed to compare the effect on bar execution velocity and number of repetitions between two velocity-based resistance training protocols only differing in the set configuration of the full-squat (SQ) and bench-press (BP) exercises. Moderately strength-trained men were assigned to a traditional (TS, n = 9)- or an alternating-set (AS, n = 10) configuration group to perform four testing sessions against different relative loads (55–60–65–70% 1RM). Relative load, magnitude of intra-set velocity loss (%VL), number of sets, inter-set recovery time, and exercise order were matched for both groups in each session. Mean propulsive velocity of the first repetition (MPVfirst), average number of repetitions per set (NRS), total number of repetitions (TNR), and total training time per session (TT) were measured. No significant differences between training conditions were observed for any relative load in MPVfirst, NRS, and TNR in both exercises. The TS group completed a significantly higher number of repetitions (p < 0.05) at faster velocities (MPV > 0.9–1.1 m·s−1) in the SQ. In conclusion, training sessions performing AS between SQ and BP exercises with moderate relative loads and %VL result in similar bar execution velocity and volume, but in a more time-efficient manner, than the traditional approach.MDPI20252025-11-1920222022-01-0120222022-01-01journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501VoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10433/25081reponame:RIO. Repositorio Institucional Olavideinstname:Universidad Pablo de Olavide (UPO)Inglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:rio.upo.es:10433/250812026-06-13T12:46:27Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Acute Effect of Upper-Lower Body Super-Set Vs. Traditional-Set Configurations on Bar Execution Velocity and Volume
title Acute Effect of Upper-Lower Body Super-Set Vs. Traditional-Set Configurations on Bar Execution Velocity and Volume
spellingShingle Acute Effect of Upper-Lower Body Super-Set Vs. Traditional-Set Configurations on Bar Execution Velocity and Volume
Peña García-Orea, Guillermo
Set configuration
Neuromuscular performance
Velocity-based training
Resistance training
title_short Acute Effect of Upper-Lower Body Super-Set Vs. Traditional-Set Configurations on Bar Execution Velocity and Volume
title_full Acute Effect of Upper-Lower Body Super-Set Vs. Traditional-Set Configurations on Bar Execution Velocity and Volume
title_fullStr Acute Effect of Upper-Lower Body Super-Set Vs. Traditional-Set Configurations on Bar Execution Velocity and Volume
title_full_unstemmed Acute Effect of Upper-Lower Body Super-Set Vs. Traditional-Set Configurations on Bar Execution Velocity and Volume
title_sort Acute Effect of Upper-Lower Body Super-Set Vs. Traditional-Set Configurations on Bar Execution Velocity and Volume
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Peña García-Orea, Guillermo
Rodríguez Rosell, David
Segarra Carrillo, Daniel
Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo
Belando Pedreño, Noelia
author Peña García-Orea, Guillermo
author_facet Peña García-Orea, Guillermo
Rodríguez Rosell, David
Segarra Carrillo, Daniel
Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo
Belando Pedreño, Noelia
author_role author
author2 Rodríguez Rosell, David
Segarra Carrillo, Daniel
Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto, Marzo
Belando Pedreño, Noelia
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Set configuration
Neuromuscular performance
Velocity-based training
Resistance training
topic Set configuration
Neuromuscular performance
Velocity-based training
Resistance training
description This study aimed to compare the effect on bar execution velocity and number of repetitions between two velocity-based resistance training protocols only differing in the set configuration of the full-squat (SQ) and bench-press (BP) exercises. Moderately strength-trained men were assigned to a traditional (TS, n = 9)- or an alternating-set (AS, n = 10) configuration group to perform four testing sessions against different relative loads (55–60–65–70% 1RM). Relative load, magnitude of intra-set velocity loss (%VL), number of sets, inter-set recovery time, and exercise order were matched for both groups in each session. Mean propulsive velocity of the first repetition (MPVfirst), average number of repetitions per set (NRS), total number of repetitions (TNR), and total training time per session (TT) were measured. No significant differences between training conditions were observed for any relative load in MPVfirst, NRS, and TNR in both exercises. The TS group completed a significantly higher number of repetitions (p < 0.05) at faster velocities (MPV > 0.9–1.1 m·s−1) in the SQ. In conclusion, training sessions performing AS between SQ and BP exercises with moderate relative loads and %VL result in similar bar execution velocity and volume, but in a more time-efficient manner, than the traditional approach.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
2022-01-01
2022
2022-01-01
2025
2025-11-19
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv journal article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
VoR
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10433/25081
url https://hdl.handle.net/10433/25081
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:RIO. Repositorio Institucional Olavide
instname:Universidad Pablo de Olavide (UPO)
instname_str Universidad Pablo de Olavide (UPO)
reponame_str RIO. Repositorio Institucional Olavide
collection RIO. Repositorio Institucional Olavide
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869403251736051712
score 15,812455

Similares en LA Referencia