Democracia, sanción penal y consentimiento: consideraciones generales acerca del papel del consentimiento en un sistema penal (¿ideal?)
Criminal systems operate by altering the motivational mechanisms that explain individuals’ behavior. To do that, the sanctioning device seems to play a major role. According to a standardly utilitarian assumption, an increment in sanction efficacy is usually followed by a proportional increment in n...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2019 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Navarra |
| Repositorio: | Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/60486 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/60486 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | democracia deliberativa sistema penal legitimidad justicia razones para la acción Nino utilitarismo retribucionismo consentimiento |
| Sumario: | Criminal systems operate by altering the motivational mechanisms that explain individuals’ behavior. To do that, the sanctioning device seems to play a major role. According to a standardly utilitarian assumption, an increment in sanction efficacy is usually followed by a proportional increment in normative compliance. In the present paper, however, I will try to show not only that the correlation between these two factors is more complex than the assumption admits, but also that a deeper understanding of human motivations provides greater insight into some aspects of our criminal systems’ justice and legitimacy that may have an impact on their moral justification. Arguing from a set of postulates that conceive our criminal systems as guaranteeing the preconditions of (deliberative) democracy, my ultimate aim will be to design a comprehensive evaluative model of the way they function grounded on the notion of consent. |
|---|