Analysis of the patient safety culture in a university hospital

Objective: 1) To determine the perception of safety of health professionals and non-health professionals in a university hospital; 2) describe the climate of safety with its strengths and weaknesses; 3) evaluate the negatively valued dimensions and establish areas of improvement. Method: Across-sect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Laborde, MM, Velazquez, MTG, Andres, JMA, Forner, GR, Rosique, AFC
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2020
País:España
Institución:Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)
Repositorio:r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica
OAI Identifier:oai:fisabio.fundanetsuite.com:p8171
Acceso en línea:https://fisabio.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/8171
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Safety culture
Patient safety
Safety perception
Adverse events
id ES_0ae6d9ab4ae1bbdd5a272fda1caed6f3
oai_identifier_str oai:fisabio.fundanetsuite.com:p8171
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Analysis of the patient safety culture in a university hospitalLaborde, MMVelazquez, MTGAndres, JMAForner, GRRosique, AFCSafety culturePatient safetySafety perceptionAdverse eventsObjective: 1) To determine the perception of safety of health professionals and non-health professionals in a university hospital; 2) describe the climate of safety with its strengths and weaknesses; 3) evaluate the negatively valued dimensions and establish areas of improvement. Method: Across-sectional and descriptive study carried out at the San Juan University Hospital in Alicante, where the results of the assessment of the safety culture level are collected using Hospital Survey On Patient Safety survey of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality adapted to Spanish language. Results: The response rate was 35.36%.The group with the greatest participation was the physician (32.3%) and the service most involved, urgencies (9%). 86.4% had contact with the patient. 50% of workers rated the safety climate between 6 and 8 points. 82.8% did not report any adverse events in the last year. The professionals with the greatest security culture were the pharmacists and with the worst culture, the guards. No strength was identified globally. There were two dimensions that behaved like a weakness: 9 (staffing) and 10 (management support for patient safety). Conclusions: The patient's perception of safety is good, although it can be improved. No strengths have been identified. The weaknesses identified are staffing, management support for patient safety, handoffs and transitions, and safety perception. (C) 2018 SESPAS. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.ELSEVIER2020info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://fisabio.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/8171Gaceta SanitariaISSN: 02139111ISSNe: 15781283reponame:r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científicainstname:Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)Españolinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:fisabio.fundanetsuite.com:p81712026-06-11T12:45:17Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of the patient safety culture in a university hospital
title Analysis of the patient safety culture in a university hospital
spellingShingle Analysis of the patient safety culture in a university hospital
Laborde, MM
Safety culture
Patient safety
Safety perception
Adverse events
title_short Analysis of the patient safety culture in a university hospital
title_full Analysis of the patient safety culture in a university hospital
title_fullStr Analysis of the patient safety culture in a university hospital
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the patient safety culture in a university hospital
title_sort Analysis of the patient safety culture in a university hospital
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Laborde, MM
Velazquez, MTG
Andres, JMA
Forner, GR
Rosique, AFC
author Laborde, MM
author_facet Laborde, MM
Velazquez, MTG
Andres, JMA
Forner, GR
Rosique, AFC
author_role author
author2 Velazquez, MTG
Andres, JMA
Forner, GR
Rosique, AFC
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Safety culture
Patient safety
Safety perception
Adverse events
topic Safety culture
Patient safety
Safety perception
Adverse events
description Objective: 1) To determine the perception of safety of health professionals and non-health professionals in a university hospital; 2) describe the climate of safety with its strengths and weaknesses; 3) evaluate the negatively valued dimensions and establish areas of improvement. Method: Across-sectional and descriptive study carried out at the San Juan University Hospital in Alicante, where the results of the assessment of the safety culture level are collected using Hospital Survey On Patient Safety survey of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality adapted to Spanish language. Results: The response rate was 35.36%.The group with the greatest participation was the physician (32.3%) and the service most involved, urgencies (9%). 86.4% had contact with the patient. 50% of workers rated the safety climate between 6 and 8 points. 82.8% did not report any adverse events in the last year. The professionals with the greatest security culture were the pharmacists and with the worst culture, the guards. No strength was identified globally. There were two dimensions that behaved like a weakness: 9 (staffing) and 10 (management support for patient safety). Conclusions: The patient's perception of safety is good, although it can be improved. No strengths have been identified. The weaknesses identified are staffing, management support for patient safety, handoffs and transitions, and safety perception. (C) 2018 SESPAS. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://fisabio.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/8171
url https://fisabio.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/8171
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Español
language_invalid_str_mv Español
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ELSEVIER
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ELSEVIER
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Gaceta Sanitaria
ISSN: 02139111
ISSNe: 15781283
reponame:r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica
instname:Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)
instname_str Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)
reponame_str r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica
collection r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869403190425812992
score 15.81155

Similares en LA Referencia