Firm growth, persistence and multiplicity of equilibria: an analysis of Spanish manufacturing and service industries.
This thesis examines to what extent the firm size influences on firm growth and their behaviour of Spanish manufactures and service industries between 1994 and 2002 from the stochastic growth theory. The study has not only responded to the need of considering firm size as a key variable for future f...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | tesis doctoral |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2006 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | CBUC, CESCA |
| Repositorio: | TDR. Tesis Doctorales en Red |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:www.tdx.cat:10803/8447 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.tdx.cat/TDX-0703107-114813 http://hdl.handle.net/10803/8447 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | industrial organisation firm demography applied ecoomics manufacturing and service industries persistence firm growth 33 |
| Sumario: | This thesis examines to what extent the firm size influences on firm growth and their behaviour of Spanish manufactures and service industries between 1994 and 2002 from the stochastic growth theory. The study has not only responded to the need of considering firm size as a key variable for future firm growth, but it has also examined the impacts of different industries for the development of firms, the learning process and the impact of internal and external firm characteristics. <br/><br/>The firm growth is the process affecting firms while they remain active in the market. While some theories justify the firm growth as an adjustment of size due to internal or external environment, others have justified the change of size as a response to luck factors.<br/><br/>To analyse it we have based on Gibrat's Law or Law of Proportionate Effects. Gibrat's Law suggests that all firms have the same probability to grow independently of their size. Although the researcher's interest to analyse it there are some mix results in the literature and there are still some lacks in the literature. <br/><br/>According to the empirical review of the Gibrat's Law, several are the results to be stood out. Firstly, the firm growth is a complex process affected by internal and external characteristics which may be due to deterministic or random factors. Secondly, there appear some outstanding lacks of empirical studies. On the one hand, there are few empirical studies analysing the service industries. On the other hand, there is a scarcity of researchers incorporating the spatial dimension in their analysis.<br/><br/>Our results refuse Gibrat's Law both for manufactures and service industries and, more interestingly, those results do not vary when introducing the firm learning process in the market. In reference to the differences between each individual sector, there appear different growth behaviours depending on the industry. It is well known that the firm growth pattern depends on the characteristics of industry and our results show a different behaviour depending on the industry. Therefore, if we consider different sectors, the firm growth pattern presents a heterogeneous trend. Each industry has quite different technologies and perhaps different growth processes, which might explain the mixed nature of the results.<br/><br/>The persistence of firm growth offers a dynamic approach to the growth pattern. The relationship between past and current growth rates have been another aspect related with Gibrat's Law. The persistence of firm growth is highly important for policy-makers and managers, who should consider the pattern driving firm growth in order to increase the profitability of their investments, the job creation and the economic growth. As it was expected, the effect of the persistence depends on the proximity of the growth. In other words, a positive growth will have more impact on the following period than two periods later. <br/><br/>Related to the analysis of the presence of different equilibria of firm growth, our results show that there is a significant difference in growth between manufacturing and service sector firms which persist when controlling for other firm specific characteristics. Nevertheless, the introduction of the location variables generates that those different trends are not significant. In order to know how important the differentiation between manufactures and service industries is, we estimate Gibrat's Law for manufactures and service industries in separate equations. When we separate the estimation of both industries, our results accept that the equilibria are different including the locational variables.<br/><br/>In reference to the determinants of firm growth, variables such as the territorial R&D and the growth of GDP have positive externalities to firm growth. On the other hand, the industrial diversity or specialisation present different results depending on the sector. Finally, barriers to entry such as capital intensity and minimum efficient size behave as barriers to grow. That means that sectors which are highly capital intensive, they will prevent firms from growing. Conversely, sectors with low barriers to entry have low barriers to grow. However, those barriers to grow may be surpassed with internal characteristics such as innovation, cooperation, increase of human capital, etc. |
|---|