Comparison of the effectiveness of phalanges vs. humeri and femurs to estimate lizard age with skeletochronology
Skeletochronology allows estimation of lizard age with a single capture (from a bone), making long-term monitoring unnecessary. Nevertheless, this method often involves the death of the animal to obtain the bone. We tested the reliability of skeletochronology of phalanges (which may be obtained with...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositorio: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:2445/150710 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/150710 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Herpetologia Demografia Conservació de la natura Herpetology Demography Nature conservation |
| id |
ES_0abcf02f5e4d76c2cbabe1e5f829ad8d |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:recercat.cat:2445/150710 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Comparison of the effectiveness of phalanges vs. humeri and femurs to estimate lizard age with skeletochronologyComas, MarReguera, SendaZamora-Camacho, Francisco J.Salvadó i Cabré, HumbertMoreno-Rueda, GregorioHerpetologiaDemografiaConservació de la naturaHerpetologyDemographyNature conservationSkeletochronology allows estimation of lizard age with a single capture (from a bone), making long-term monitoring unnecessary. Nevertheless, this method often involves the death of the animal to obtain the bone. We tested the reliability of skeletochronology of phalanges (which may be obtained without killing) by comparing the estimated age from femurs and humeri with the age estimated from phalanges. Our results show skeletochronology of phalanges is a reliable method to estimate age in lizards as cross-section readings from all bones studied presented a high correlation and repeatability regardless of the bone chosen. This approach provides an alternative to the killing of lizards for skeletochronology studies.Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona2020202020162020info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion4 p.application/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/150710Articles publicats en revistes (Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals)reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2016.39.0237Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 2016, vol. 39, num. 2, p. 237-240https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2016.39.0237cc-by (c) Comas, Mar et al., 2016http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/esinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:2445/1507102026-05-29T05:05:01Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of the effectiveness of phalanges vs. humeri and femurs to estimate lizard age with skeletochronology |
| title |
Comparison of the effectiveness of phalanges vs. humeri and femurs to estimate lizard age with skeletochronology |
| spellingShingle |
Comparison of the effectiveness of phalanges vs. humeri and femurs to estimate lizard age with skeletochronology Comas, Mar Herpetologia Demografia Conservació de la natura Herpetology Demography Nature conservation |
| title_short |
Comparison of the effectiveness of phalanges vs. humeri and femurs to estimate lizard age with skeletochronology |
| title_full |
Comparison of the effectiveness of phalanges vs. humeri and femurs to estimate lizard age with skeletochronology |
| title_fullStr |
Comparison of the effectiveness of phalanges vs. humeri and femurs to estimate lizard age with skeletochronology |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of the effectiveness of phalanges vs. humeri and femurs to estimate lizard age with skeletochronology |
| title_sort |
Comparison of the effectiveness of phalanges vs. humeri and femurs to estimate lizard age with skeletochronology |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Comas, Mar Reguera, Senda Zamora-Camacho, Francisco J. Salvadó i Cabré, Humbert Moreno-Rueda, Gregorio |
| author |
Comas, Mar |
| author_facet |
Comas, Mar Reguera, Senda Zamora-Camacho, Francisco J. Salvadó i Cabré, Humbert Moreno-Rueda, Gregorio |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Reguera, Senda Zamora-Camacho, Francisco J. Salvadó i Cabré, Humbert Moreno-Rueda, Gregorio |
| author2_role |
author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Herpetologia Demografia Conservació de la natura Herpetology Demography Nature conservation |
| topic |
Herpetologia Demografia Conservació de la natura Herpetology Demography Nature conservation |
| description |
Skeletochronology allows estimation of lizard age with a single capture (from a bone), making long-term monitoring unnecessary. Nevertheless, this method often involves the death of the animal to obtain the bone. We tested the reliability of skeletochronology of phalanges (which may be obtained without killing) by comparing the estimated age from femurs and humeri with the age estimated from phalanges. Our results show skeletochronology of phalanges is a reliable method to estimate age in lizards as cross-section readings from all bones studied presented a high correlation and repeatability regardless of the bone chosen. This approach provides an alternative to the killing of lizards for skeletochronology studies. |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016 2020 2020 2020 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/150710 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/150710 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2016.39.0237 Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 2016, vol. 39, num. 2, p. 237-240 https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2016.39.0237 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
cc-by (c) Comas, Mar et al., 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
cc-by (c) Comas, Mar et al., 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
4 p. application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Articles publicats en revistes (Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals) reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| instname_str |
Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| reponame_str |
Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| collection |
Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869403180808273920 |
| score |
15,811543 |