Woman or tennis player? Visual typicality and lexical frequency affect variation in object naming

Speakers often use different names to refer to the same entity (e.g., “woman” vs. “tennis player”). We here explore factors that affect naming variation for visually presented objects. We analyze a large dataset of object names with realistic images and focus on two factors: visual typicality (of bo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Gualdoni, Eleonora, Brochhagen, Thomas, Mädebach, Andreas, Boleda, Gemma
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2022
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:10230/56221
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10230/56221
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:object naming
naming variation
visual typicality
object typicality
context typicality
lexical frequency
id ES_08e2808f2ebed495c32c89e41c2ff4f5
oai_identifier_str oai:recercat.cat:10230/56221
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Woman or tennis player? Visual typicality and lexical frequency affect variation in object namingGualdoni, EleonoraBrochhagen, ThomasMädebach, AndreasBoleda, Gemmaobject namingnaming variationvisual typicalityobject typicalitycontext typicalitylexical frequencySpeakers often use different names to refer to the same entity (e.g., “woman” vs. “tennis player”). We here explore factors that affect naming variation for visually presented objects. We analyze a large dataset of object names with realistic images and focus on two factors: visual typicality (of both objects and the contexts they appear in) and name frequency. We develop a novel computational approach to estimate visual typicality, using image representations from Computer Vision models. Specifically, we compute visual typicality as similarity between the representation of an object/context to the average representation of other objects/contexts of its nominal class. In contrast to previous studies, we not only study the name used by most annotators for a given object (top name), but also the second most frequently used (alternative name). Our results show that the top name and the alternative name pull in opposite directions. People’s naming choices are more varied for objects that are less typical for their top name, or more typical for their alternative name. They are also more varied when the top name has relatively low frequency (for alternative names, the opposite effect may be present but the data are not conclusive). Context typicality instead does not show a general effect in our analysis. Overall, our results show that visual and lexical characteristics relating to name candidates beyond the top name are informative for predicting variability in object naming. On a methodological level, we demonstrate the potential of using large scale datasets with realistic images in conjunction with computational methods to inform models of human object naming.This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. 715154) and the Spanish Research Agency (ref. PID2020-112602GB-I00).Cognitive Science Society202320232022info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/56221reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésProceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Societyinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/715154info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/2PE/PID2020-112602GB-I00©2022 The Author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY).https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:10230/562212026-05-29T05:05:01Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Woman or tennis player? Visual typicality and lexical frequency affect variation in object naming
title Woman or tennis player? Visual typicality and lexical frequency affect variation in object naming
spellingShingle Woman or tennis player? Visual typicality and lexical frequency affect variation in object naming
Gualdoni, Eleonora
object naming
naming variation
visual typicality
object typicality
context typicality
lexical frequency
title_short Woman or tennis player? Visual typicality and lexical frequency affect variation in object naming
title_full Woman or tennis player? Visual typicality and lexical frequency affect variation in object naming
title_fullStr Woman or tennis player? Visual typicality and lexical frequency affect variation in object naming
title_full_unstemmed Woman or tennis player? Visual typicality and lexical frequency affect variation in object naming
title_sort Woman or tennis player? Visual typicality and lexical frequency affect variation in object naming
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gualdoni, Eleonora
Brochhagen, Thomas
Mädebach, Andreas
Boleda, Gemma
author Gualdoni, Eleonora
author_facet Gualdoni, Eleonora
Brochhagen, Thomas
Mädebach, Andreas
Boleda, Gemma
author_role author
author2 Brochhagen, Thomas
Mädebach, Andreas
Boleda, Gemma
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv object naming
naming variation
visual typicality
object typicality
context typicality
lexical frequency
topic object naming
naming variation
visual typicality
object typicality
context typicality
lexical frequency
description Speakers often use different names to refer to the same entity (e.g., “woman” vs. “tennis player”). We here explore factors that affect naming variation for visually presented objects. We analyze a large dataset of object names with realistic images and focus on two factors: visual typicality (of both objects and the contexts they appear in) and name frequency. We develop a novel computational approach to estimate visual typicality, using image representations from Computer Vision models. Specifically, we compute visual typicality as similarity between the representation of an object/context to the average representation of other objects/contexts of its nominal class. In contrast to previous studies, we not only study the name used by most annotators for a given object (top name), but also the second most frequently used (alternative name). Our results show that the top name and the alternative name pull in opposite directions. People’s naming choices are more varied for objects that are less typical for their top name, or more typical for their alternative name. They are also more varied when the top name has relatively low frequency (for alternative names, the opposite effect may be present but the data are not conclusive). Context typicality instead does not show a general effect in our analysis. Overall, our results show that visual and lexical characteristics relating to name candidates beyond the top name are informative for predicting variability in object naming. On a methodological level, we demonstrate the potential of using large scale datasets with realistic images in conjunction with computational methods to inform models of human object naming.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
2023
2023
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10230/56221
url http://hdl.handle.net/10230/56221
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/715154
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/2PE/PID2020-112602GB-I00
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cognitive Science Society
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cognitive Science Society
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
instname_str Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
reponame_str Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
collection Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869403074001371136
score 15.81155