Current training landscape for novice robotic surgeons: an international investigative survey by the Junior-ERUS/Young academic urologists (YAU) robotics in urology working group

IntroductionWhile robotic surgical training is crucial for preparing skilled surgeons, the landscape of available training programs is not well-defined. Many institutions offer structured curricula, yet transparency about training modalities, caseloads, and eligibility criteria for novice surgeons i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Wuernschimmel, C, Wenzel, M, Moschovas, MC, Dell'Oglio, P, Paciotti, M, Bravi, CA, De Groote, R, Di Maida, F, Piramide, F, Turri, F, Andras, I, Sorce, G, Liakos, N, Breda, A, Larcher, A
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:España
Institución:Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)
Repositorio:r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau
OAI Identifier:oai:iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com:p19700
Acceso en línea:https://iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=19700
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Robotic education
Simulator
Dry-lab
Wet-lab
Robotic surgery
Survey
id ES_08d3be0d7e4c75e55b558f3e8d1a1f6a
oai_identifier_str oai:iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com:p19700
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Current training landscape for novice robotic surgeons: an international investigative survey by the Junior-ERUS/Young academic urologists (YAU) robotics in urology working groupWuernschimmel, CWenzel, MMoschovas, MCDell'Oglio, PPaciotti, MBravi, CADe Groote, RDi Maida, FPiramide, FTurri, FAndras, ISorce, GLiakos, NBreda, ALarcher, ARobotic educationSimulatorDry-labWet-labRobotic surgerySurveyIntroductionWhile robotic surgical training is crucial for preparing skilled surgeons, the landscape of available training programs is not well-defined. Many institutions offer structured curricula, yet transparency about training modalities, caseloads, and eligibility criteria for novice surgeons is limited. To address this gap, a structured survey was designed to assess robotic education offerings globally.Patients and methodsA web-based survey was distributed to different robotic societies, institutions and dedicated robotic surgery experts, based on the Junior European Association of Urology Robotic Section (J-ERUS) network and the Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Robotic Section between February and September 2024. Furthermore, a peer-esteem snowballing approach allowed the survey to expand its reach through expert referrals. The survey captured information on training modalities, infrastructure, caseload, and case mix. Respondents were required to provide contact details for further follow-up, while their identities and institutions remained confidential.ResultsThe survey achieved a 16.5% response rate, with 80 respondents from 49 institutions confirming robotic training opportunities. Training platforms included Da Vinci multi-port systems (71%), HUGO-RAS (15%), and Versius (8%). Training methods featured simulators (89%), dual-console training (65%), dry-labs (39%), and wet-labs (16%). Variability in training structures was observed, with 32% of institutions offering dedicated fellowships and 68% combining training with clinical duties. Institutions varied in case volumes (100-500 cases per year), and 41% indicated performing over 500 robotic procedures annually. Respondents predominantly answered that robotic surgery novices may access about 20% of these cases.ConclusionThis study highlights the heterogeneity of robotic surgical education and the need for standardized, globally accessible training frameworks. Establishing an international consortium to map training programs and content could enhance transparency and support novice surgeons in selecting institutions that align with their career goals. It is critical to integrate emerging robotic platforms and evolving methodologies into curricula to ensure comprehensive and effective training.SPRINGER2025info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=19700WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGYISSN: 07244983ISSNe: 14338726reponame:r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pauinstname:Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)Inglésinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com:p197002026-06-14T12:41:47Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Current training landscape for novice robotic surgeons: an international investigative survey by the Junior-ERUS/Young academic urologists (YAU) robotics in urology working group
title Current training landscape for novice robotic surgeons: an international investigative survey by the Junior-ERUS/Young academic urologists (YAU) robotics in urology working group
spellingShingle Current training landscape for novice robotic surgeons: an international investigative survey by the Junior-ERUS/Young academic urologists (YAU) robotics in urology working group
Wuernschimmel, C
Robotic education
Simulator
Dry-lab
Wet-lab
Robotic surgery
Survey
title_short Current training landscape for novice robotic surgeons: an international investigative survey by the Junior-ERUS/Young academic urologists (YAU) robotics in urology working group
title_full Current training landscape for novice robotic surgeons: an international investigative survey by the Junior-ERUS/Young academic urologists (YAU) robotics in urology working group
title_fullStr Current training landscape for novice robotic surgeons: an international investigative survey by the Junior-ERUS/Young academic urologists (YAU) robotics in urology working group
title_full_unstemmed Current training landscape for novice robotic surgeons: an international investigative survey by the Junior-ERUS/Young academic urologists (YAU) robotics in urology working group
title_sort Current training landscape for novice robotic surgeons: an international investigative survey by the Junior-ERUS/Young academic urologists (YAU) robotics in urology working group
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Wuernschimmel, C
Wenzel, M
Moschovas, MC
Dell'Oglio, P
Paciotti, M
Bravi, CA
De Groote, R
Di Maida, F
Piramide, F
Turri, F
Andras, I
Sorce, G
Liakos, N
Breda, A
Larcher, A
author Wuernschimmel, C
author_facet Wuernschimmel, C
Wenzel, M
Moschovas, MC
Dell'Oglio, P
Paciotti, M
Bravi, CA
De Groote, R
Di Maida, F
Piramide, F
Turri, F
Andras, I
Sorce, G
Liakos, N
Breda, A
Larcher, A
author_role author
author2 Wenzel, M
Moschovas, MC
Dell'Oglio, P
Paciotti, M
Bravi, CA
De Groote, R
Di Maida, F
Piramide, F
Turri, F
Andras, I
Sorce, G
Liakos, N
Breda, A
Larcher, A
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Robotic education
Simulator
Dry-lab
Wet-lab
Robotic surgery
Survey
topic Robotic education
Simulator
Dry-lab
Wet-lab
Robotic surgery
Survey
description IntroductionWhile robotic surgical training is crucial for preparing skilled surgeons, the landscape of available training programs is not well-defined. Many institutions offer structured curricula, yet transparency about training modalities, caseloads, and eligibility criteria for novice surgeons is limited. To address this gap, a structured survey was designed to assess robotic education offerings globally.Patients and methodsA web-based survey was distributed to different robotic societies, institutions and dedicated robotic surgery experts, based on the Junior European Association of Urology Robotic Section (J-ERUS) network and the Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Robotic Section between February and September 2024. Furthermore, a peer-esteem snowballing approach allowed the survey to expand its reach through expert referrals. The survey captured information on training modalities, infrastructure, caseload, and case mix. Respondents were required to provide contact details for further follow-up, while their identities and institutions remained confidential.ResultsThe survey achieved a 16.5% response rate, with 80 respondents from 49 institutions confirming robotic training opportunities. Training platforms included Da Vinci multi-port systems (71%), HUGO-RAS (15%), and Versius (8%). Training methods featured simulators (89%), dual-console training (65%), dry-labs (39%), and wet-labs (16%). Variability in training structures was observed, with 32% of institutions offering dedicated fellowships and 68% combining training with clinical duties. Institutions varied in case volumes (100-500 cases per year), and 41% indicated performing over 500 robotic procedures annually. Respondents predominantly answered that robotic surgery novices may access about 20% of these cases.ConclusionThis study highlights the heterogeneity of robotic surgical education and the need for standardized, globally accessible training frameworks. Establishing an international consortium to map training programs and content could enhance transparency and support novice surgeons in selecting institutions that align with their career goals. It is critical to integrate emerging robotic platforms and evolving methodologies into curricula to ensure comprehensive and effective training.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=19700
url https://iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=19700
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SPRINGER
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SPRINGER
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
ISSN: 07244983
ISSNe: 14338726
reponame:r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau
instname:Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)
instname_str Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)
reponame_str r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau
collection r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869403070574624768
score 15,812429