Discourse Quality in Times of Populism: An Analysis of German Parliamentary Debates on Immigration Policy

Right-wing populists are on the rise in Europe in the last decade. Their populism undermines one of the central pillars of democracy, the political discourse. Populism affects the quality of political debates in parliaments. With the emergence of the “Alternative für Deutschland” (AfD) a populist pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Kesting, N. (Norbert)|||/items/c9dbc985-87fc-4eef-990c-a363fb694142, Reiberg, A. (Abel)|||/items/9d3c8baa-43d2-43b4-a0f2-099b4e7dbd2c, Hocks, P. (Phillip)|||/items/0a7704ab-5637-4576-adee-a700c53451cc
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2018
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Navarra
Repositorio:Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/55783
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10171/55783
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Discourse Quality
Populism
Parliamentary Debates
Cognitive Complexity
AfD
Descripción
Sumario:Right-wing populists are on the rise in Europe in the last decade. Their populism undermines one of the central pillars of democracy, the political discourse. Populism affects the quality of political debates in parliaments. With the emergence of the “Alternative für Deutschland” (AfD) a populist party became relevant nationally for the first time in over sixty years. By applying the concept of Cognitive Complexity as an instrument to measure deliberative quality, we analyze to what extend the discourse quality in the German Bundestag in debates on immigration policies varied over the 18th legislative period. Cognitive Complexity is measured quantitatively by applying a linguistic approach based on the LIWC dictionary. Despite our initial expectations, there are no trends detectable and the rise of the populist AfD does not alter the discourse quality so far. Nonetheless, there exist major differences in discourse quality between the parties, most notably opposition parties have a lower discourse quality in their statements than governing parties. In addition, individual characteristics of the speaker such as gender, age or electoral type do not render any differences. However, there seem to be differences depending on the federal state in which the speaker’s electoral district lies.