Is "Back to my Point" a Pragmatic Marker?
Discourse management markers (DMMs) that "signal a meta-comment on the structure of the discourse" (Fraser 2009) are widely attested in historical data. Most discourse management markers (e.g. and, anyway, by the way, but, now, then) meet well-known criteria for pragmatic markers such as m...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona |
| Repositorio: | Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ddd.uab.cat:235139 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://ddd.uab.cat/record/235139 https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.5565/rev/catjl.307 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Diachrony Discourse management markers Discourse markers English Pragmatic markers Diacronia Marcadors de gestió del discurs Marcadors discursius Anglès Marcadors pragmàtics |
| Resumo: | Discourse management markers (DMMs) that "signal a meta-comment on the structure of the discourse" (Fraser 2009) are widely attested in historical data. Most discourse management markers (e.g. and, anyway, by the way, but, now, then) meet well-known criteria for pragmatic markers such as multifunctionality, opacity, optionality, (inter)subjectivity, relatively high frequency, and shortness. However, several cited in Fraser (2009), many of them topic-orientation markers, do not (e.g. back to my original point, to return to my previous topic, if I might continue). I propose that an account of the development of DMMs make a distinction between adverbial adjuncts, conjunct adverbials, and pragmatic markers (e.g. Hasselgård 2010). By hypothesis, change may occur along the cline: adverbial adjuncts. |
|---|