Anterolateral Thigh Flap for Acute/Primary Burn Reconstruction

Introduction: The indication for a free flap in acute burn reconstruction is very specific. It should avoid several complications that are more common in the burned patient population. We propose an anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap as a first option for primary burn reconstruction in microvascular fre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Verdaguer, Eva, Bulla, Antonio|||0009-0004-6343-6298, Serracanta Domènech, Jordi|||0000-0003-3268-6361, Rivas-Nicolls, Danilo|||0000-0003-1137-289X, Barret Nerín, Juan Pedro|||0000-0001-7115-4830
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:España
Institución:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:315601
Acceso en línea:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/315601
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.3390/ebj6020034
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Burns
Burn reconstruction
Microsurgery
Free flap
ALT flap
Flap safety
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction: The indication for a free flap in acute burn reconstruction is very specific. It should avoid several complications that are more common in the burned patient population. We propose an anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap as a first option for primary burn reconstruction in microvascular free flap reconstruction in burned patients. Patients and Methods: A retrospective review of all acutely burned patients treated with microvascular ALT free flap reconstruction between the years 2005 and 2022 in the Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus Burn Centre was conducted. Results: We performed 30 ALT flaps for primary burn reconstruction. The majority of patients were male (87.5%), with a mean age of 36.7 years, and 37% of patients were smokers. High-voltage electrical burns were the most common etiology. The mean time between burn injury and microsurgery was 22 days. The main recipient site was the lower limb. The flap survival rate was 96.6%. One patient required a meshed skin graft to cover a defect in the proximal third due to peripheral flap necrosis. One flap experienced mild congestion, which resolved spontaneously. Another flap had a local infection, which resolved with antibiotic therapy and surgical debridement. Conclusions: An ALT flap offers several advantages to a burned patient, provided that the surgical technique and postoperative management described in this study are followed. We propose it as the first option for primary burn reconstruction using free flaps in a burned patient.