Taxonomy and hierarchy of psychological abuse strategies in intimate partner relationships
Taking a psychosocial perspective this study analyses the com-ponents of psychological abuse in intimate adult partner violence against women. Following a review of studies on the subject the main objective that emerged was the need for a new taxonomy of psychological abuse strategies, one which sho...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2014 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Barcelona |
| Repositorio: | Dipòsit Digital de la UB |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/101814 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/101814 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Assetjament psicològic Violència conjugal Presa de decisions Classificació Psychological abuse Marital violence Decision making Classification |
| Sumario: | Taking a psychosocial perspective this study analyses the com-ponents of psychological abuse in intimate adult partner violence against women. Following a review of studies on the subject the main objective that emerged was the need for a new taxonomy of psychological abuse strategies, one which should include their corresponding operational defini-tions. The proposed new classification was then evaluated by means of a Delphi study involving 32 experts from the academic and professional worlds. These experts were asked to assess the suitability of the system cat-egories and to rate the severity of the impact made by each of the strategies on the global phenomenon of psychological abuse in couples. The results show that the experts ratified the new classification of strategies and the corresponding operational definitions, thereby endorsing their content and construct validity. When rating the strategies according to the severity of their impact, those of an emotional nature were considered the most se-vere, followed by those related to the immediate context, those of a cogni-tive nature and, finally, behavioural strategies. We discuss the results and their implications. |
|---|