Evaluación por pares y heteroevaluación en un proyecto de creación de materiales para la divulgación científica enfermera
[EN] Peer evaluation is an evaluation strategy that allows meaningful learning. In this experience, a project for the creation of informative material has been proposed, evaluated by peers through a rubric and with quantitative and qualitative return of the assessment to the creators of the material...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | capítulo de libro |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV) |
| Repositorio: | RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/200714 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/200714 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Divulgación científica Rúbrica analítica Evaluación por pares Rúbrica Scientific dissemination Analytical rubric Peer review Rubric |
| Sumario: | [EN] Peer evaluation is an evaluation strategy that allows meaningful learning. In this experience, a project for the creation of informative material has been proposed, evaluated by peers through a rubric and with quantitative and qualitative return of the assessment to the creators of the material. Once the subject creation project was completed, an evaluation was carried out by teaching staff outside the project in order to verify the coherence of both evaluations. The results have shown that the students carry out a more benevolent evaluation than the teachers, but both controls were coherent in the continuous evaluation of learning. We can say that the use of the rubric as a peer assessment tool is useful and brings benefits to learning, but it is necessary to identify a criterion that allows resolving the differences observed in the results issued by students and teachers. |
|---|