Endocardial infarct scar recognition by myocardial electrical impedance is not influenced by changes in cardiac activation sequence

BACKGROUND Measurement of myocardial electrical impedance can allow recognition of infarct scar and is theoretically not influenced by changes in cardiac activation sequence, but this is not known. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study were to evaluate the ability of endocardial electrical impedan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Amoros-Figueras, G, Jorge, E, Alonso-Martin, C, Traver, D, Ballesta, M, Bragos, R, Rosell-Ferrer, J, Cinca, J
Format: article
Status:Published version
Publication Date:2018
Country:España
Institution:Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)
Repository:r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau
OAI Identifier:oai:iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com:p3807
Online Access:https://iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=3807
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Electroanatomic mapping
Healed myocardial infarction
Myocardial electrical impedance
Pig
Ventricular pacing
Description
Summary:BACKGROUND Measurement of myocardial electrical impedance can allow recognition of infarct scar and is theoretically not influenced by changes in cardiac activation sequence, but this is not known. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study were to evaluate the ability of endocardial electrical impedance measurements to recognize areas of infarct scar and to assess the stability of the impedance data under changes in cardiac activation sequence. METHODS One-month-old myocardial infarction confirmed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was induced in 5 pigs submitted to coronary artery catheter balloon occlusion. Electroanatomic data and local electrical impedance (magnitude, phase angle, and amplitude of the systolic-diastolic impedance curve) were recorded at multiple endocardial sites in sinus rhythm and during right ventricular pacing. By merging the cardiac magnetic resonance and electroanatomic data, we classified each impedance measurement site either as healthy (bipolar amplitude >= 1.5 mV and maximum pixel intensity <40%) or scar (bipolar amplitude <1.5 mV and maximum pixel intensity >= 40%). RESULTS A total of 137 endocardial sites were studied. Compared to healthy tissue, areas of infarct scar showed 37.4% reduction in impedance magnitude (P<.001) and 21.5% decrease in phase angle (P<.001). The best predictive ability to detect infarct scar was achieved by the combination of the 4 impedance parameters (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.96; 95% confidence interval 0.92-1.00). In contrast to voltage mapping, right ventricular pacing did not significantly modify the impedance data. CONCLUSION Endocardial catheter measurement of electrical impedance can identify infarct scar regions, and in contrast to voltage mapping, the impedance data are not affected by changes in cardiac activation sequence.