Ecosystem services and justice of protected areas

Protected areas are key instruments for conserving biodiversity and landscapes. Yet, conservation initiatives are still often struggling to accommodate people's needs, provoking conflicts, and lacking support from local communities. Our study combines environmental justice and ecosystem service...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Benetti, Stefania|||0000-0003-1442-6697, Langemeyer, Johannes|||0000-0002-0558-8486
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Recursos:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:271689
Acesso em linha:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/271689
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1080/26395916.2021.1946155
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Matthias Schröter
Environmental conservation
Social-ecological systems
Social equity
Natural resources management
Shifting ecologic values
Stakeholder perceptions
Aichi Target 11
id ES_01d7a4abae31b90fb0a2bf55ffdf5947
oai_identifier_str oai:ddd.uab.cat:271689
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Ecosystem services and justice of protected areasthe case of Circeo National Park, ItalyBenetti, Stefania|||0000-0003-1442-6697Langemeyer, Johannes|||0000-0002-0558-8486Matthias SchröterEnvironmental conservationSocial-ecological systemsSocial equityNatural resources managementShifting ecologic valuesStakeholder perceptionsAichi Target 11Protected areas are key instruments for conserving biodiversity and landscapes. Yet, conservation initiatives are still often struggling to accommodate people's needs, provoking conflicts, and lacking support from local communities. Our study combines environmental justice and ecosystem services approaches to provide a critical understanding of trade-offs between people's interests and conservation goals in the case study of Circeo National Park (Italy). Applying a qualitative content analysis of different materials and using a survey of local residents, we focus on three main objectives: analysing the implementation of the ecosystem services framework in policy documents and exploring how different people value benefits from nature; investigating the decision-making process in terms of participation, information and communication strategies; and identifying how conservation policies generated different allocations of benefits, burdens and inequalities among social groups. The integrated approach applied in our study highlights ways to systematically uncover perceived injustices and identifies potential conflict lines. In the long run, this approach might help to increase the public acceptance of protected areas by fostering sustainability also in its often-overlooked social dimension. 22021-01-0120212021-01-01Articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501VoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://ddd.uab.cat/record/271689https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1080/26395916.2021.1946155reponame:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UABinstname:Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaInglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, la comunicació pública de l'obra i la creació d'obres derivades, fins i tot amb finalitats comercials, sempre i quan es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ddd.uab.cat:2716892026-06-06T12:50:31Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ecosystem services and justice of protected areas
the case of Circeo National Park, Italy
title Ecosystem services and justice of protected areas
spellingShingle Ecosystem services and justice of protected areas
Benetti, Stefania|||0000-0003-1442-6697
Matthias Schröter
Environmental conservation
Social-ecological systems
Social equity
Natural resources management
Shifting ecologic values
Stakeholder perceptions
Aichi Target 11
title_short Ecosystem services and justice of protected areas
title_full Ecosystem services and justice of protected areas
title_fullStr Ecosystem services and justice of protected areas
title_full_unstemmed Ecosystem services and justice of protected areas
title_sort Ecosystem services and justice of protected areas
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Benetti, Stefania|||0000-0003-1442-6697
Langemeyer, Johannes|||0000-0002-0558-8486
author Benetti, Stefania|||0000-0003-1442-6697
author_facet Benetti, Stefania|||0000-0003-1442-6697
Langemeyer, Johannes|||0000-0002-0558-8486
author_role author
author2 Langemeyer, Johannes|||0000-0002-0558-8486
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Matthias Schröter
Environmental conservation
Social-ecological systems
Social equity
Natural resources management
Shifting ecologic values
Stakeholder perceptions
Aichi Target 11
topic Matthias Schröter
Environmental conservation
Social-ecological systems
Social equity
Natural resources management
Shifting ecologic values
Stakeholder perceptions
Aichi Target 11
description Protected areas are key instruments for conserving biodiversity and landscapes. Yet, conservation initiatives are still often struggling to accommodate people's needs, provoking conflicts, and lacking support from local communities. Our study combines environmental justice and ecosystem services approaches to provide a critical understanding of trade-offs between people's interests and conservation goals in the case study of Circeo National Park (Italy). Applying a qualitative content analysis of different materials and using a survey of local residents, we focus on three main objectives: analysing the implementation of the ecosystem services framework in policy documents and exploring how different people value benefits from nature; investigating the decision-making process in terms of participation, information and communication strategies; and identifying how conservation policies generated different allocations of benefits, burdens and inequalities among social groups. The integrated approach applied in our study highlights ways to systematically uncover perceived injustices and identifies potential conflict lines. In the long run, this approach might help to increase the public acceptance of protected areas by fostering sustainability also in its often-overlooked social dimension.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2
2021-01-01
2021
2021-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
VoR
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://ddd.uab.cat/record/271689
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1080/26395916.2021.1946155
url https://ddd.uab.cat/record/271689
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1080/26395916.2021.1946155
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
instname:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
instname_str Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
reponame_str Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
collection Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869402612899512320
score 15,300719

Registos relacionados