Effect of prior martensite formation on the bainite transformation kinetics in high-strength 3% Mn multiphase steel
The work presents results on the effect of prior martensite formation on bainite transformation kinetics in a 3% medium-Mn multiphase steel. The material was subjected to two isothermal holding temperatures: 400 °C (without martensite) and 350 °C (with prior martensite). According to obtained dilato...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| Repositorio: | DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digital.csic.es:10261/289234 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/289234 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Multiphase steel Dilatometry Transformation kinetics Bainitic reaction Martensite |
| Sumario: | The work presents results on the effect of prior martensite formation on bainite transformation kinetics in a 3% medium-Mn multiphase steel. The material was subjected to two isothermal holding temperatures: 400 °C (without martensite) and 350 °C (with prior martensite). According to obtained dilatometric results, the formation of prior martensite leads to the acceleration of bainite transformation kinetics. The bainite formation starts and finishes much faster, when the prior martensite was present before the isothermal holding. The microstructural investigation of the steel after heat treatment was carried out using light and scanning electron microscopy. The microstructures were composed of fine bainitic laths with retained austenite and small amount of martensitic-austenitic islands at 400 °C. At 350 °C the presence of large tempered martensite laths was detected. The bainite is composed of a mixture of fine and coarse laths. The increase of the bainitic lath thickness is attributed to the coalescence process occurring at the lower holding temperature. The differences in the steel hardness after the two heat treatments were relatively small (~ 13 HV10). |
|---|