An analysis of preservice chemistry teachers’ misconceptions of reduction-oxidation reaction concepts
This article describes a study of 149 preservice chemistry teachers’ misconceptions of concepts related to a reduction-oxidation reaction. A mixed-method approach was used to obtain data through the ROXCI (Redox Concept Inventory) instrument and interviews. Result indicated that the highest misconce...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) |
| Repositorio: | UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/374153 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/2117/374153 https://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1566 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Chemistry -- Study and teaching Teachers -- Training of Teachers -- Rating of Misconceptions Oxidation-reduction reactions Preservice chemistry teachers Química -- Ensenyament Professors -- Formació Professors -- Avaluació Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Ensenyament i aprenentatge::Formació del professorat (formació de formadors) |
| Sumario: | This article describes a study of 149 preservice chemistry teachers’ misconceptions of concepts related to a reduction-oxidation reaction. A mixed-method approach was used to obtain data through the ROXCI (Redox Concept Inventory) instrument and interviews. Result indicated that the highest misconceptions were for item number 10 (4.03% or only 6 of 149 students answered correctly) and the lowest misconception occurred on item number 1 (94.63% or 141 of 149 students answered correctly). These results were supported by the analysis of the interviews where the respondents produced misconceptions when explaining the process of electron transfer in redox reactions. The highest percentage of consistent answers in the six ROXCI categories was obtained in the surface feature concept category (6.71% or 10 out of 149 respondents consistently answered correctly). This shows that preservice chemistry teachers are not able to connect the three levels of chemical representation, macroscopic, microscopic, and symbolic in studying chemistry, especially for the redox concept. Analysis of the relationships between misconceptions and average student confidence shows that every distractor chosen by the respondents at every level was followed by a degree of confidence of between 50%-70%, indicating that misconceptions became stronger because the preservice chemistry teachers did not realize that a concept believed to be true is wrong |
|---|