We can't have no satisfaction
Many authors agree that there is a dimension of conflict expressed through discourse that eludes purely semantic approaches. How and why do conative attitudes conflict? The latter question is the object of this paper. Conflicts of attitudes are typically modelled on one of two models. The first impo...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Barcelona |
| Repositorio: | Dipòsit Digital de la UB |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/147064 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/147064 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Filosofia del llenguatge Conflicte (Psicologia) Discussió Anàlisi del discurs Philosophy of language Conflict (Psychology) Discussion Discourse analysis |
| id |
ES_008117dbdad28dbfbceabd2d95a4755a |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/147064 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
We can't have no satisfactionMarques, TeresaFilosofia del llenguatgeConflicte (Psicologia)DiscussióAnàlisi del discursPhilosophy of languageConflict (Psychology)DiscussionDiscourse analysisMany authors agree that there is a dimension of conflict expressed through discourse that eludes purely semantic approaches. How and why do conative attitudes conflict? The latter question is the object of this paper. Conflicts of attitudes are typically modelled on one of two models. The first imposes a Subjective Rationality constraint on conflicting attitudes, and the second depends on the impossibility of Joint Satisfaction. This paper assesses whether either of the two conditions can account for conflicting attitudes. First, it argues that Subjective Rationality cannot account for intersubjective conflicts. Second, it presents putative counterexamples to Joint Satisfaction. The counterexamples arise on the assumption that the attitudes are first personal. The paper then explores two alternatives: nihilism about attitudinal conflicts, and dropping the assumption that the relevant attitudes are first-personal states. Embracing nihilism would be devastating for expressivists and other non-cognitivists. But dropping the assumption on which the counterexamples to Satisfaction depend requires a new account of the conative attitudes expressed in value discourse. The paper concludes by pointing to an alternative.Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos2016info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/147064Articles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)reponame:Dipòsit Digital de la UBinstname:Universidad de BarcelonaInglésReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2016.173.07Filosofia Unisinos, 2016, vol. 17, num. 3, p. 308-314https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2016.173.07info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/675415cc-by (c) Marques, Teresa, 2016http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/esinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/1470642026-05-27T06:46:51Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
We can't have no satisfaction |
| title |
We can't have no satisfaction |
| spellingShingle |
We can't have no satisfaction Marques, Teresa Filosofia del llenguatge Conflicte (Psicologia) Discussió Anàlisi del discurs Philosophy of language Conflict (Psychology) Discussion Discourse analysis |
| title_short |
We can't have no satisfaction |
| title_full |
We can't have no satisfaction |
| title_fullStr |
We can't have no satisfaction |
| title_full_unstemmed |
We can't have no satisfaction |
| title_sort |
We can't have no satisfaction |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Marques, Teresa |
| author |
Marques, Teresa |
| author_facet |
Marques, Teresa |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Filosofia del llenguatge Conflicte (Psicologia) Discussió Anàlisi del discurs Philosophy of language Conflict (Psychology) Discussion Discourse analysis |
| topic |
Filosofia del llenguatge Conflicte (Psicologia) Discussió Anàlisi del discurs Philosophy of language Conflict (Psychology) Discussion Discourse analysis |
| description |
Many authors agree that there is a dimension of conflict expressed through discourse that eludes purely semantic approaches. How and why do conative attitudes conflict? The latter question is the object of this paper. Conflicts of attitudes are typically modelled on one of two models. The first imposes a Subjective Rationality constraint on conflicting attitudes, and the second depends on the impossibility of Joint Satisfaction. This paper assesses whether either of the two conditions can account for conflicting attitudes. First, it argues that Subjective Rationality cannot account for intersubjective conflicts. Second, it presents putative counterexamples to Joint Satisfaction. The counterexamples arise on the assumption that the attitudes are first personal. The paper then explores two alternatives: nihilism about attitudinal conflicts, and dropping the assumption that the relevant attitudes are first-personal states. Embracing nihilism would be devastating for expressivists and other non-cognitivists. But dropping the assumption on which the counterexamples to Satisfaction depend requires a new account of the conative attitudes expressed in value discourse. The paper concludes by pointing to an alternative. |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/147064 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/147064 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2016.173.07 Filosofia Unisinos, 2016, vol. 17, num. 3, p. 308-314 https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2016.173.07 info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/675415 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
cc-by (c) Marques, Teresa, 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
cc-by (c) Marques, Teresa, 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Articles publicats en revistes (Filosofia) reponame:Dipòsit Digital de la UB instname:Universidad de Barcelona |
| instname_str |
Universidad de Barcelona |
| reponame_str |
Dipòsit Digital de la UB |
| collection |
Dipòsit Digital de la UB |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869402505433055232 |
| score |
15,300719 |