Legal Pluralism: Current Constitutional Developments

The recognition of legal pluralism by International Law on Human Rights, especia-lly by Convention 169 of the ILO, as well as its positivization in the Constitutions of some Latin American States, allows us to affirm that this principle must move from its foundational phase to the phase of its conso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Cantillo Pushaina, Juan José
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:Ecuador
Institución:Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar
Repositorio:Revista FORO: REVISTA DE DERECHO
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.uasb.edu.ec:article/2823
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/2823
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:law
systems
pluralism
dialogue
jurisdiction
transitional
people
indigenous
derecho
sistemas
pluralismo
diálogo
jurisdicción
transicional
pueblos
indígenas
id EC_fb9a6a49352bebc68ee3890cb6dc085d
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.uasb.edu.ec:article/2823
network_acronym_str EC
network_name_str Ecuador
repository_id_str
spelling Legal Pluralism: Current Constitutional DevelopmentsPluralismo jurídico: avances constitucionales actualesCantillo Pushaina, Juan JosélawsystemspluralismdialoguejurisdictiontransitionalpeopleindigenousderechosistemaspluralismodiálogojurisdiccióntransicionalpueblosindígenasThe recognition of legal pluralism by International Law on Human Rights, especia-lly by Convention 169 of the ILO, as well as its positivization in the Constitutions of some Latin American States, allows us to affirm that this principle must move from its foundational phase to the phase of its consolidation. This article aims to describe the current perspective with which legal pluralism is studied, showing a problem of approach based on the lack of coordination and articulation between legal science, legal sociology and legal anthropology, causing a crisis and a stag-nation in the development of the concept. The solution, of course, is that the study of legal pluralism must be carried out from the perspective of law. This is the only way to facilitate a normative and interjurisdictional dialogue between indigenous law and State law in the strict sense, which will make legal pluralism effective. In Colombia, the Special Jurisdiction for Peace is an example of this beginning of dialogue between jurisdictions.El reconocimiento del pluralismo jurídico por el Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos, especialmente por el Convenio 169 de la OIT, así como su positivización en las Constituciones de algunos Estados de América Latina, permi-ten afirmar que este principio debe transitar de su fase fundacional a la fase de su consolidación. Este artículo pretende, por medio de un método exploratorio y deductivo, describir la actual perspectiva con la que se estudia el pluralismo jurídico evidenciando un problema de abordaje desde la ciencia jurídica, puesto que la sociología y la antropología jurídica que lo estudian actualmente no consultan el derecho, originando una crisis y un estancamiento en el desarrollo del concepto. La solución, evidente, es que el estudio del pluralismo jurídico debe realizarse normativamente desde la perspectiva del derecho. Solo así se facilitará el diálogo normativo e interjurisdiccional entre el derecho indígena y el derecho estatal en sentido estricto, que efectivice el pluralismo jurídico. En Colombia, la Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz es una muestra de ese inicio de diálogo entre jurisdicciones.Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Sede Ecuador.2021-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmltext/htmlhttps://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/282310.32719/26312484.2021.36.10Foro: Law Journal; No. 36 (2021): LAW AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES; 193-211Foro: Revista de Derecho; Núm. 36 (2021): DERECHO Y NUEVAS TECNOLOGÍAS; 193-2112631-24841390-2466reponame:Revista FORO: REVISTA DE DERECHOinstname:Universidad Andina Simón Bolivarinstacron:UASBspahttps://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/2823/2585https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/2823/2604https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/2823/2627info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-07-30T21:31:18Zoai:revistas.uasb.edu.ec:article/2823Portal de revistashttps://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foroInstitución privadahttp://www.uasb.edu.ec/https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/oaiEcuador2631-24841390-2466opendoar:02021-07-30T21:31:18falsePortal de revistashttps://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foroInstitución privadahttp://www.uasb.edu.ec/https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/oaiEcuador2631-24841390-2466opendoar:02021-07-30T21:31:18Revista FORO: REVISTA DE DERECHO - Universidad Andina Simón Bolivarfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Legal Pluralism: Current Constitutional Developments
Pluralismo jurídico: avances constitucionales actuales
title Legal Pluralism: Current Constitutional Developments
spellingShingle Legal Pluralism: Current Constitutional Developments
Cantillo Pushaina, Juan José
law
systems
pluralism
dialogue
jurisdiction
transitional
people
indigenous
derecho
sistemas
pluralismo
diálogo
jurisdicción
transicional
pueblos
indígenas
title_short Legal Pluralism: Current Constitutional Developments
title_full Legal Pluralism: Current Constitutional Developments
title_fullStr Legal Pluralism: Current Constitutional Developments
title_full_unstemmed Legal Pluralism: Current Constitutional Developments
title_sort Legal Pluralism: Current Constitutional Developments
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cantillo Pushaina, Juan José
author Cantillo Pushaina, Juan José
author_facet Cantillo Pushaina, Juan José
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv law
systems
pluralism
dialogue
jurisdiction
transitional
people
indigenous
derecho
sistemas
pluralismo
diálogo
jurisdicción
transicional
pueblos
indígenas
topic law
systems
pluralism
dialogue
jurisdiction
transitional
people
indigenous
derecho
sistemas
pluralismo
diálogo
jurisdicción
transicional
pueblos
indígenas
description The recognition of legal pluralism by International Law on Human Rights, especia-lly by Convention 169 of the ILO, as well as its positivization in the Constitutions of some Latin American States, allows us to affirm that this principle must move from its foundational phase to the phase of its consolidation. This article aims to describe the current perspective with which legal pluralism is studied, showing a problem of approach based on the lack of coordination and articulation between legal science, legal sociology and legal anthropology, causing a crisis and a stag-nation in the development of the concept. The solution, of course, is that the study of legal pluralism must be carried out from the perspective of law. This is the only way to facilitate a normative and interjurisdictional dialogue between indigenous law and State law in the strict sense, which will make legal pluralism effective. In Colombia, the Special Jurisdiction for Peace is an example of this beginning of dialogue between jurisdictions.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/2823
10.32719/26312484.2021.36.10
url https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/2823
identifier_str_mv 10.32719/26312484.2021.36.10
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/2823/2585
https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/2823/2604
https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/2823/2627
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Sede Ecuador.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Sede Ecuador.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Foro: Law Journal; No. 36 (2021): LAW AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES; 193-211
Foro: Revista de Derecho; Núm. 36 (2021): DERECHO Y NUEVAS TECNOLOGÍAS; 193-211
2631-2484
1390-2466
reponame:Revista FORO: REVISTA DE DERECHO
instname:Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar
instacron:UASB
instname_str Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar
instacron_str UASB
institution UASB
reponame_str Revista FORO: REVISTA DE DERECHO
collection Revista FORO: REVISTA DE DERECHO
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista FORO: REVISTA DE DERECHO - Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869000298228350976
score 15,301603

Similares en LA Referencia