Comprobación de la culpabilidad a partir de la verosimilitud del testimonio de la víctima en los delitos sexuales en la persona mayor de 14 años.
The development of this investigative work will lead to the judicial conclusion of the predetermining problem in criminal procedural practice in those cases where, for the crime of rape, the legality of the testimony of the alleged victim is sufficient evidence and sometimes even full evidence for t...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | tesis de maestría |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | Ecuador |
| Institución: | Universidad de Otavalo |
| Repositorio: | Repositorio Universidad de Otavalo |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.uotavalo.edu.ec:52000/827 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://repositorio.uotavalo.edu.ec/handle/52000/827 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Derecho Penal Culpabilidad Violencia sexual Delito |
| Sumario: | The development of this investigative work will lead to the judicial conclusion of the predetermining problem in criminal procedural practice in those cases where, for the crime of rape, the legality of the testimony of the alleged victim is sufficient evidence and sometimes even full evidence for the rupture of the state. constitutional birth certificate of innocence of the alleged aggressor; rupture that sometimes will be subject to the rest of the test as a principle of unity, more in the cases to be studied, it is completely opposed by debating healthy judicial criticism. Within the assessment of the evidence in violation procedures; As a Unit we must locate the determination that the testimony provided by the alleged victim may or may not have in a way when referring to judicial cases in which the tests or expert opinions do not reach the conclusion of the existence of carnal access by the alleged perpetrator. According to the foregoing, it is the moment in which the comprehensive protection of the alleged sexual victim who seeks to avail himself of state protection both because of his vulnerability and because of the essential protection gained in the social contract with the regulatory State from which the powers emanate mainly for our investigation that court that is in charge of prosecuting the person responsible, proven said responsibility conflicts with the principle of presumption of innocence where we locate the need to execute our current investigation both in analogous cases and doctrinally it can be seen. |
|---|