Beyond Aid: A New Metric for Official Development Assistance Post-2015
The study attempts to respond to the question, “after 2015, what will constitute the idea of ‘beyond aid,’ whose origins were associated with the policy coherence?” After analyzing the new context of fatigue in Official Development Assistance (ODA) and the identity crisis of the aid regime, the vari...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2013 |
| País: | Ecuador |
| Institución: | Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales |
| Repositorio: | Revista ICONOS |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:iconos.flacsoandes.edu.ec:article/821 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://iconos.flacsoandes.edu.ec/index.php/iconos/article/view/821 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | AOD Cooperación al Desarrollo Cooperación Sur-Sur Coherencia de políticas Financiación del Desarrollo ODA Development Cooperation South-South Cooperation Policy Coherence Financing for Development. |
| Sumario: | The study attempts to respond to the question, “after 2015, what will constitute the idea of ‘beyond aid,’ whose origins were associated with the policy coherence?” After analyzing the new context of fatigue in Official Development Assistance (ODA) and the identity crisis of the aid regime, the various metrics proposed for a redefinition of the concept of ODA after 2015 are addressed. It seems that in no case ODA will be related to the initial idea of policy coherence, but rather to an attempt among the traditional European donors to cover over their failure to fulfill their commitment to 0.7% of GNP and relax criteria with the (entirely uncertain) purpose of attracting providers of South-South assistance cooperation from the big leagues (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, or BRICS) and the secondary leagues (Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Turkey, Mexico, Chile, Colombia, or Peru) to the Development Assistance Committee. |
|---|