Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa), Amaranto (Amaranthus caudatus) y Arginina como ingredientes protectores en tintes para cabello
This research is based on evaluating the protective effect of seed extract Chenopodium quinoa, Amaranthus caudatus flower extract and the amino acid arginine in hair dye. It was considered formulate the dye 6.66 corresponding to deep reddish blond color. Each active in the formulation containing 2%...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | tesis de maestría |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2015 |
| País: | Ecuador |
| Institución: | Universidad Politécnica Salesiana |
| Repositorio: | Repositorio Universidad Politécnica Salesiana |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dspace.ups.edu.ec:123456789/7790 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://dspace.ups.edu.ec/handle/123456789/7790 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | TECNOLOGÍAS Y COSMÉTICA CABELLO CHENOPODIUM QUINOA |
| Sumario: | This research is based on evaluating the protective effect of seed extract Chenopodium quinoa, Amaranthus caudatus flower extract and the amino acid arginine in hair dye. It was considered formulate the dye 6.66 corresponding to deep reddish blond color. Each active in the formulation containing 2% concentration and its effect is compared with white (dye without active). After formulating dyes tinturar proceeds to virgin hair tufts washes quadruplicate for 1, 5, 10, 15 and 20 in each treatment. Each strand after the final wash is immersed in methanol to remove residual color for 30 minutes. To the obtained methanolic solution of washing the absorbance is measured. The generated data show that test assets have impact on the protection of color in the dye, this follows by increased absorbance presented in the 3 assets compared to white, corresponding to the best treatment Amaranth in Second Arginine and finally Quinoa. In applying the analysis of variance detected significant difference exists 1% between treatments. Which leads to a statistical functional analysis to determine the behavior between them, finally concluding that there is no significant difference between treatments according to the Tukey test. |
|---|