The Totalizing and Silencing Features of Meta‐Narratives and Master Concepts
This paper is organized in the following way. First I deal with Hardt’s and Negri’s Empire; the second section of the paper focuses on Beck´s World Risk Society; the third main section of this paper tackles the functional differentiation argument posed by Buzan and Albert. By way of conclusion, the...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | Ecuador |
| Institución: | Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar |
| Repositorio: | Repositorio Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.uasb.edu.ec:10644/4712 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10644/4712 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | NUEVO ORDEN ECONÓMICO INTERNACIONAL RELACIONES INTERNACIONALES IMPERIALISMO |
| Sumario: | This paper is organized in the following way. First I deal with Hardt’s and Negri’s Empire; the second section of the paper focuses on Beck´s World Risk Society; the third main section of this paper tackles the functional differentiation argument posed by Buzan and Albert. By way of conclusion, the final section of this paper briefly discusses alternatives to grand-narratives and master concepts. |
|---|