NGOs and their impact on the adoption of technologies: Case of cocoa producers in the Quinsaloma canton, Ecuador

The study was carried out in Quinsaloma canton, Los Ríos province, Ecuador, in order to determine the level of adoption of technology in cocoa cultivation. 68 beneficiaries of three ONGs were surveyed [(ADVI-VOCA (25), MCCH (22), ANECACAO (21)] and 27 producers that they do not receive TA, applying...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Simba Ochoa, Luis Fernando, González Osorio, Betty Beatriz, Torres Navarrete, Emma Danielly, Vallejo Sevillano, Luis Alonso, Gaibor Indio, Glenda María, Gaibor Fernández, Ramiro Remigio
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2018
País:Ecuador
Institución:Universidad Estatal Amazónica
Repositorio:Revista Amazónica. Ciencia y Tecnología
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs_revista.www.uea.edu.ec:article/101
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.uea.edu.ec/index.php/racyt/article/view/101
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Cacao Nacional
CCN51
excedente económico
impacto
National Cocoa
economic surplus
impact mitigation
Descripción
Sumario:The study was carried out in Quinsaloma canton, Los Ríos province, Ecuador, in order to determine the level of adoption of technology in cocoa cultivation. 68 beneficiaries of three ONGs were surveyed [(ADVI-VOCA (25), MCCH (22), ANECACAO (21)] and 27 producers that they do not receive TA, applying a simple random sampling, considering the farmers that in their properties have national cocoa (CN) and Castro Naranjal Collection (CCN-51) and whose plantation age is homogeneous. The data were tabulated by SPSS version 13. It was established that ONGs used various training and accompaniment strategies until post-harvest and commercialization The greatest increase in productivity for CN was found in the producers advised by ACDI-VOCA (105.56%), and for CCN-51 those advised by ANECACAO (189.74%), when comparing the productivity of the CN and CCN-51 of the farmers who received TA in relation to those who did not receive, in the case of the CN. It was 42.31%, 33.33% and 48.72% and for CCN-51 it was 105.74%, 140.47% and 159.77% for each NGO respectively. Higher Profitability was obtained by farmers cattle that received AT from ANECACO with 60.64% (CN) and 130.08% (CCN-51). The economic surplus of the increase in the area grown are the production was greater than 50% with positive displacement of the supply curve and the last one, the impact on productivity is also positive since the average increase in production was 100.11 percent.