Multilateralism before the interdict and the crossroad
This article examines how the US decision to attack Iraq goes against both the nature of multilateralism and the rules of international law. The “preventive action” and the “confrontation between good and evil” are seen as the main milestones of the US's international vision. The author argues...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | Ecuador |
| Institución: | Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar |
| Repositorio: | Revista Comentario Internacional |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.uasb.edu.ec:article/176 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/comentario/article/view/176 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Estados Unidos comunidad intenacional multilateralismo Derecho Internacional. United States Internarnational Community multilateralism International Law |
| Sumario: | This article examines how the US decision to attack Iraq goes against both the nature of multilateralism and the rules of international law. The “preventive action” and the “confrontation between good and evil” are seen as the main milestones of the US's international vision. The author argues for the necessity of a renewal of multilateralism so that it does lose its validity. |
|---|